{ "meta": { "book": { "id": "laozi", "title": "老子", "titleSimp": "老子", "author": "老聃", "authorSimp": "老聃", "era": "春秋", "eraSimp": "春秋", "editor": "河上公、王弼等", "editorSimp": "河上公、王弼等", "edition": "王弼《老子注》", "editionSimp": "王弼《老子注》", "slug": "laozi", "baseLabel": "王弼《老子注》", "baseLabelSimp": "王弼《老子注》", "separationLabel": "河上公章句、王弼注、成玄英義疏、唐玄宗御注御疏、嚴遵指歸、李榮注、陸希聲傳、呂惠卿傳、蘇轍老子解、吳澄道德真經注、憨山道德經解、魏源老子本義、俞樾平議、王夫之老子衍十四家", "separationLabelSimp": "河上公章句、王弼注、成玄英义疏、唐玄宗御注御疏、严遵指归、李荣注、陆希声传、吕惠卿传、苏辙老子解、吴澄道德真经注、憨山道德经解、魏源老子本义、俞樾平议、王夫之老子衍十四家", "intro": "《老子》八十一章，分道經、德經。LibreBook 以王弼《老子注》為底本，逐章整理正文、舊注、今譯與校記；第一至八十一章已上線，全帙完竣。", "introSimp": "《老子》八十一章，分道经、德经。LibreBook 以王弼《老子注》为底本，逐章整理正文、旧注、今译与校记；第一至八十一章已上线，全帙完竣。" }, "chapter": { "id": "laozi-14", "no": 14, "part": "道經", "partSimp": "道经", "title": "第十四章", "titleSimp": "第十四章", "intro": "《老子》第十四章，河上公題「贊玄」，唐玄宗、呂惠卿、蘇轍並題「視之不見章」。全章六句：前三句分標夷、希、微三名，第四句總明三者不可致詰而混為一，第五句狀道之不皦不昧、繩繩不可名而復歸無物，第六句以執古御今、知古始為道紀作結。本站以王弼《老子注》為底本，分列河上公章句、王弼注、成玄英義疏、唐玄宗御注御疏、嚴遵指歸、李榮注、陸希聲傳、呂惠卿傳、蘇轍《老子解》、吳澄《道德真經注》、釋德清《道德經解》、魏源《老子本義》與王夫之《老子衍》，並附編者今譯。嚴遵道經原卷缺卷一至六，此章僅存「繩繩不可名」「無狀之狀」「執古之道」下三條輯文；王弼以三段注通釋全章，故其說分見於混一、無狀、執古諸組。分章則河上公、王弼、唐玄宗、王夫之以此章為第十四章；吳澄、魏源合上章於前，此章在其本題為第十三章。", "introSimp": "《老子》第十四章，河上公题「赞玄」，唐玄宗、吕惠卿、苏辙并题「视之不见章」。全章六句：前三句分标夷、希、微三名，第四句总明三者不可致诘而混为一，第五句状道之不皦不昧、绳绳不可名而复归无物，第六句以执古御今、知古始为道纪作结。本站以王弼《老子注》为底本，分列河上公章句、王弼注、成玄英义疏、唐玄宗御注御疏、严遵指归、李荣注、陆希声传、吕惠卿传、苏辙《老子解》、吴澄《道德真经注》、释德清《道德经解》、魏源《老子本义》与王夫之《老子衍》，并附编者今译。严遵道经原卷缺卷一至六，此章仅存「绳绳不可名」「无状之状」「执古之道」下三条辑文；王弼以三段注通释全章，故其说分见于混一、无状、执古诸组。分章则河上公、王弼、唐玄宗、王夫之以此章为第十四章；吴澄、魏源合上章于前，此章在其本题为第十三章。", "guide": "點擊任一句可展開句注；點擊字詞可看本句訓釋；按「諸家並觀」可將同一句的十三家舊注並列對讀。", "guideSimp": "点击任一句可展开句注；点击字词可看本句训释；按「诸家并观」可将同一句的十三家旧注并列对读。", "slug": "14", "order": 14, "status": "published", "revision": "初校", "review": "待复核", "updated": "2026-10-29", "summary": "以「視之不見，名曰夷；聽之不聞，名曰希；搏之不得，名曰微」起筆，次言三者混而為一、無狀之狀無物之象，末以「執古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是謂道紀」收束；附河上公、王弼、成玄英、唐玄宗、嚴遵、李榮、陸希聲、呂惠卿、蘇轍、吳澄、憨山、魏源、王夫之十三家注疏，嚴遵道經原卷缺卷一至六，此章三條輯文存於《玄德纂疏》，河上公、成玄英、唐玄宗、李榮逐句有注，陸希聲、呂惠卿、憨山、魏源、王夫之各以整章一段通釋，異文並見校記。", "summarySimp": "以「视之不见，名曰夷；听之不闻，名曰希；搏之不得，名曰微」起笔，次言三者混而为一、无状之状无物之象，末以「执古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是谓道纪」收束；附河上公、王弼、成玄英、唐玄宗、严遵、李荣、陆希声、吕惠卿、苏辙、吴澄、憨山、魏源、王夫之十三家注疏，严遵道经原卷缺卷一至六，此章三条辑文存于《玄德纂疏》，河上公、成玄英、唐玄宗、李荣逐句有注，陆希声、吕惠卿、憨山、魏源、王夫之各以整章一段通释，异文并见校记。", "dataFile": "data/chapters/laozi-14.json", "relationsFile": "data/commentary-relations-laozi-14.json", "url": "/laozi/14/", "volumeId": "daojing", "volumeTitle": "道經", "volumeTitleSimp": "道经", "orderLabel": "第十四" }, "edition": { "base": "王弼《老子注》", "baseEdition": "王弼《老子注》通行本", "separation": "河上公《老子道德經章句》、成玄英《老子道德經義疏》、唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》、嚴遵《道德真經指歸》（《玄德纂疏》輯文）、李榮《道德真經注》、陸希聲《道德真經傳》、呂惠卿《道德真經傳》、蘇轍《老子解》、吳澄《道德真經注》、釋德清《道德經解》、魏源《老子本義》、王夫之《老子衍》諸本對校；陸希聲、呂惠卿、李榮三家據《道藏》本，參焦竑《老子翼》所輯", "punctuation": "數字轉錄所附現代標點，本站僅作閱讀輔助，尚未逐字復核原刻", "digital": "中華典藏網、識典古籍、大道家園公開轉錄、Kanripo 漢籍全文資料庫（僅作文字底本）", "caution": "王弼底本「以御今之有」下有「有有其事」四字，當是注文羼入或衍文，諸本無之，正文逕刪。河上公「以知古始」，王弼、御注、蘇轍、吳澄、憨山、魏源並作「能知古始」；蘇轍「故復混而為一」，諸本無「復」字；憨山「是谓为无状之状」衍「为」，「不能以昏其礼」疑當作「明」，今並存校記。魏源底本「之不见其首」「御令之有」並訛。李榮「乘乘不可名」，諸本作「繩繩」。正文從王弼本，異文見校記。", "baseSimp": "王弼《老子注》", "baseEditionSimp": "王弼《老子注》通行本", "separationSimp": "河上公《老子道德经章句》、成玄英《老子道德经义疏》、唐玄宗《道德真经注疏》、严遵《道德真经指归》（《玄德纂疏》辑文）、李荣《道德真经注》、陆希声《道德真经传》、吕惠卿《道德真经传》、苏辙《老子解》、吴澄《道德真经注》、释德清《道德经解》、魏源《老子本义》、王夫之《老子衍》诸本对校；陆希声、吕惠卿、李荣三家据《道藏》本，参焦竑《老子翼》所辑", "punctuationSimp": "数字转录所附现代标点，本站仅作阅读辅助，尚未逐字复核原刻", "digitalSimp": "中华典藏网、识典古籍、大道家园公开转录、Kanripo 汉籍全文资料库（仅作文字底本）", "cautionSimp": "王弼底本「以御今之有」下有「有有其事」四字，当是注文羼入或衍文，诸本无之，正文迳删。河上公「以知古始」，王弼、御注、苏辙、吴澄、憨山、魏源并作「能知古始」；苏辙「故复混而为一」，诸本无「复」字；憨山「是谓为无状之状」衍「为」，「不能以昏其礼」疑当作「明」，今并存校记。魏源底本「之不见其首」「御令之有」并讹。李荣「乘乘不可名」，诸本作「绳绳」。正文从王弼本，异文见校记。" }, "license": { "historical": "公有領域", "translation": "CC BY-SA 4.0", "code": "MIT" }, "stats": { "sentences": 6, "commentaries": 49, "charNotes": 13, "collations": 12 } }, "sources": [ { "id": "heshanggong", "name": "河上公章句", "short": "河上公", "author": "河上公", "work": "老子道德經章句", "era": "漢", "years": "傳漢文帝時", "color": "#a3542c", "desc": "分章句解，兼重治身與治國；此章題「贊玄」，以「一」為無彩色、無音聲、無體形，三者合而為一；其上不皎、其下不昧，繩繩動行無窮；聖人執古道生一以御萬物，知上古本始有一為道紀。", "count": 6, "nameSimp": "河上公章句", "workSimp": "老子道德经章句", "authorSimp": "河上公", "eraSimp": "汉", "yearsSimp": "传汉文帝时", "descSimp": "分章句解，兼重治身与治国；此章题「赞玄」，以「一」为无彩色、无音声、无体形，三者合而为一；其上不皎、其下不昧，绳绳动行无穷；圣人执古道生一以御万物，知上古本始有一为道纪。", "shortSimp": "河上公" }, { "id": "wangbi", "name": "王弼注", "short": "王注", "author": "王弼", "work": "老子道德經注", "era": "曹魏", "years": "226–249", "color": "#8c5a2b", "desc": "以崇本息末為宗；此章謂道無狀無象、無聲無響，故不可致詰而混為一；欲言有無皆不得其形，故曰無狀之狀、無物之象、惚恍；執古之道以御今之有，知古始為道紀。", "count": 3, "nameSimp": "王弼注", "workSimp": "老子道德经注", "authorSimp": "王弼", "eraSimp": "曹魏", "yearsSimp": "226–249", "descSimp": "以崇本息末为宗；此章谓道无状无象、无声无响，故不可致诘而混为一；欲言有无皆不得其形，故曰无状之状、无物之象、惚恍；执古之道以御今之有，知古始为道纪。", "shortSimp": "王注" }, { "id": "chengxuanying", "name": "成玄英疏", "short": "成疏", "author": "成玄英", "work": "老子道德經義疏", "era": "唐", "years": "約 608–669", "color": "#6b7a4a", "desc": "以重玄雙遣為宗；此章以夷平、希少、微妙釋三名，散一為三、混三歸一而不一不異；以不增不減、非古非今明道，末以持太古無名之道調御今之有為說。", "count": 6, "nameSimp": "成玄英疏", "workSimp": "老子道德经义疏", "authorSimp": "成玄英", "eraSimp": "唐", "yearsSimp": "约 608–669", "descSimp": "以重玄双遣为宗；此章以夷平、希少、微妙释三名，散一为三、混三归一而不一不异；以不增不减、非古非今明道，末以持太古无名之道调御今之有为说。", "shortSimp": "成疏" }, { "id": "tangxuanzong", "name": "唐玄宗御注御疏", "short": "御注", "author": "李隆基", "work": "道德真經注疏", "era": "唐", "years": "685–762", "color": "#9b3d3d", "desc": "帝王御注，兼採諸家；御注以夷平易、希聲微、微妙色釋三名，道非聲色形法故不可致詰；以不皎不昧、運動無窮、妙本湛然明道，末以執古無為御今有為、道化綱紀為說。御疏敷衍其義。", "count": 12, "nameSimp": "唐玄宗御注御疏", "workSimp": "道德真经注疏", "authorSimp": "李隆基", "eraSimp": "唐", "yearsSimp": "685–762", "descSimp": "帝王御注，兼采诸家；御注以夷平易、希声微、微妙色释三名，道非声色形法故不可致诘；以不皎不昧、运动无穷、妙本湛然明道，末以执古无为御今有为、道化纲纪为说。御疏敷衍其义。", "shortSimp": "御注" }, { "id": "yanzun", "name": "嚴遵指歸", "short": "嚴指歸", "author": "嚴遵", "work": "道德真經指歸", "era": "漢", "years": "約前 83–10", "color": "#7a5c3e", "desc": "道經原卷缺卷一至六，此章僅存「繩繩不可名」「無狀之狀」「執古之道」下三條輯文；以沉沉汎汎、復歸虛空、無狀無不狀、無象無不象、執古自然以御今為說。", "count": 3, "nameSimp": "严遵指归", "workSimp": "道德真经指归", "authorSimp": "严遵", "eraSimp": "汉", "yearsSimp": "约前 83–10", "descSimp": "道经原卷缺卷一至六，此章仅存「绳绳不可名」「无状之状」「执古之道」下三条辑文；以沉沉泛泛、复归虚空、无状无不状、无象无不象、执古自然以御今为说。", "shortSimp": "严指归" }, { "id": "lirong", "name": "李榮注", "short": "李注", "author": "李榮", "work": "道德真經注", "era": "唐", "years": "生卒不詳", "color": "#4f6b7a", "desc": "唐初道士，以重玄遣執解《老》；此章以夷平、希聲、微機釋三名，一三互遣、忘言契理；以不皎不昧、歸無遣無明道，末以持無為正有為、上御下正為說。", "count": 6, "nameSimp": "李荣注", "workSimp": "道德真经注", "authorSimp": "李荣", "eraSimp": "唐", "yearsSimp": "生卒不详", "descSimp": "唐初道士，以重玄遣执解《老》；此章以夷平、希声、微机释三名，一三互遣、忘言契理；以不皎不昧、归无遣无明道，末以持无为正有为、上御下正为说。", "shortSimp": "李注" }, { "id": "luxisheng", "name": "陸希聲傳", "short": "陸傳", "author": "陸希聲", "work": "道德經傳", "era": "唐", "years": "？–895", "color": "#6a5a7a", "desc": "以情性說道器；此章謂道非色聲形，強名希夷微；不皦不昧、繩繩運行而復歸無物；執古無為御今有為，能知太古淳樸之性為道紀。", "count": 1, "nameSimp": "陆希声传", "workSimp": "道德经传", "authorSimp": "陆希声", "eraSimp": "唐", "yearsSimp": "？–895", "descSimp": "以情性说道器；此章谓道非色声形，强名希夷微；不皦不昧、绳绳运行而复归无物；执古无为御今有为，能知太古淳朴之性为道纪。", "shortSimp": "陆传" }, { "id": "lvhuiqing", "name": "呂惠卿傳", "short": "呂傳", "author": "呂惠卿", "work": "道德真經傳", "era": "北宋", "years": "1032–1111", "color": "#7a6a4a", "desc": "北宋新學一系；此章以視、聽、搏三者求道而不得，混而為一；能玄能黃、能宮能商、能陰能陽，不可名以色聲形；不皦不昧、繩繩有信而不可名，無前無後、不古不今，執古御今為道紀。", "count": 1, "nameSimp": "吕惠卿传", "workSimp": "道德真经传", "authorSimp": "吕惠卿", "eraSimp": "北宋", "yearsSimp": "1032–1111", "descSimp": "北宋新学一系；此章以视、听、搏三者求道而不得，混而为一；能玄能黄、能宫能商、能阴能阳，不可名以色声形；不皦不昧、绳绳有信而不可名，无前无后、不古不今，执古御今为道纪。", "shortSimp": "吕传" }, { "id": "suzhe", "name": "蘇轍老子解", "short": "蘇解", "author": "蘇轍", "work": "老子解", "era": "北宋", "years": "1039–1112", "color": "#4a6a6a", "desc": "以性為說；此章謂所以見聞觸者不可見聞觸，三者混歸於性；道在上下而不皦不昧，繩繩運而不絕，卒歸於無；執古所從生以御今，為道紀。", "count": 5, "nameSimp": "苏辙老子解", "workSimp": "老子解", "authorSimp": "苏辙", "eraSimp": "北宋", "yearsSimp": "1039–1112", "descSimp": "以性为说；此章谓所以见闻触者不可见闻触，三者混归于性；道在上下而不皦不昧，绳绳运而不绝，卒归于无；执古所从生以御今，为道纪。", "shortSimp": "苏解" }, { "id": "wucheng", "name": "吳澄道德真經注", "short": "吳注", "author": "吳澄", "work": "道德真經注", "era": "元", "years": "1249–1333", "color": "#5a6a3a", "desc": "元代朱學大家；此章以德跡呈露為說，謂夷希微與一皆指常德，德在有無之間，雖有名而不可名；道無物故無狀無象，德有名故可狀可象；道紀者德，如理絲有條而不紊。其本合上章，此題第十三章。", "count": 3, "nameSimp": "吴澄道德真经注", "workSimp": "道德真经注", "authorSimp": "吴澄", "eraSimp": "元", "yearsSimp": "1249–1333", "descSimp": "元代朱学大家；此章以德迹呈露为说，谓夷希微与一皆指常德，德在有无之间，虽有名而不可名；道无物故无状无象，德有名故可状可象；道纪者德，如理丝有条而不紊。其本合上章，此题第十三章。", "shortSimp": "吴注" }, { "id": "hanshan", "name": "憨山道德經解", "short": "憨山", "author": "釋德清", "work": "道德經解", "era": "明", "years": "1546–1623", "color": "#705a4a", "desc": "晚明高僧；此章以大道體虛、超乎聲色名相為說，夷無色、希無聲、微無相，三者混融為一；繩繩不絕而不可名，復歸無物；聖人執此妙道以御世，知古始為道統所繫。", "count": 1, "nameSimp": "憨山道德经解", "workSimp": "道德经解", "authorSimp": "释德清", "eraSimp": "明", "yearsSimp": "1546–1623", "descSimp": "晚明高僧；此章以大道体虚、超乎声色名相为说，夷无色、希无声、微无相，三者混融为一；绳绳不绝而不可名，复归无物；圣人执此妙道以御世，知古始为道统所系。", "shortSimp": "憨山" }, { "id": "weiyuan", "name": "魏源老子本義", "short": "魏本義", "author": "魏源", "work": "老子本義", "era": "清", "years": "1794–1857", "color": "#3d5a6a", "desc": "清代今文經學家；此章多校文字異同，引吳澄、呂惠卿為說，以德跡呈露、道紀為德、無端之紀為說。", "count": 1, "nameSimp": "魏源老子本义", "workSimp": "老子本义", "authorSimp": "魏源", "eraSimp": "清", "yearsSimp": "1794–1857", "descSimp": "清代今文经学家；此章多校文字异同，引吴澄、吕惠卿为说，以德迹呈露、道纪为德、无端之纪为说。", "shortSimp": "魏本义" }, { "id": "wangfuzhi", "name": "船山衍", "short": "船山", "author": "王夫之", "work": "老子衍", "era": "清", "years": "1619–1692", "color": "#3f5d52", "desc": "以「無間」乘「有間」為說；此章謂物有間而人不知故物皆為患，道無間而人強分故道僅為名；以無間乘有間，則患與名去而斯為無物；道生於未陰未陽而死於仁義。", "count": 1, "nameSimp": "船山衍", "workSimp": "老子衍", "authorSimp": "王夫之", "eraSimp": "清", "yearsSimp": "1619–1692", "descSimp": "以「无间」乘「有间」为说；此章谓物有间而人不知故物皆为患，道无间而人强分故道仅为名；以无间乘有间，则患与名去而斯为无物；道生于未阴未阳而死于仁义。", "shortSimp": "船山" }, { "id": "translator", "name": "本站今譯", "short": "今譯", "author": "LibreBook 編者", "work": "今譯", "era": "當代", "years": "", "color": "#8a8a8a", "desc": "編者據舊注與上下文所作語體今譯，供閱讀參照。", "count": 6, "nameSimp": "本站今译", "workSimp": "今译", "authorSimp": "LibreBook 编者", "eraSimp": "当代", "yearsSimp": "", "descSimp": "编者据旧注与上下文所作语体今译，供阅读参照。", "shortSimp": "今译" } ], "sentences": [ { "id": "s001", "paragraph": 1, "text": "視之不見，名曰夷；聽之不聞，名曰希；搏之不得，名曰微。", "textSimp": "视之不见，名曰夷；听之不闻，名曰希；搏之不得，名曰微。", "translation": "看它却看不见，叫作「夷」；听它却听不到，叫作「希」；摸它却摸不着，叫作「微」。", "translationTrad": "看它卻看不見，叫作「夷」；聽它卻聽不到，叫作「希」；摸它卻摸不著，叫作「微」。", "noteIds": [ "c001", "c007", "c010", "c016", "c022", "c031", "c037", "c038", "c039", "c044", "c047", "c048", "c049" ], "noteCount": 13, "charNoteIds": [ "n001", "n002", "n003", "n004" ], "key": "laozi-14:s001", "n": 1 }, { "id": "s002", "paragraph": 1, "text": "此三者不可致詰，故混而為一。", "textSimp": "此三者不可致诘，故混而为一。", "translation": "这三者无从追问穷究，所以混同为一体。", "translationTrad": "這三者無從追問窮究，所以混同為一體。", "noteIds": [ "c002", "c007", "c011", "c017", "c023", "c032", "c037", "c038", "c039", "c044", "c047", "c048", "c049" ], "noteCount": 13, "charNoteIds": [ "n005", "n006" ], "key": "laozi-14:s002", "n": 2 }, { "id": "s003", "paragraph": 1, "text": "其上不皦，其下不昧，繩繩不可名，復歸於無物。", "textSimp": "其上不皦，其下不昧，绳绳不可名，复归于无物。", "translation": "它上面不显得光亮，下面不显得昏暗；绵延不绝而不可名状，最终回归于无形无物。", "translationTrad": "它上面不顯得光亮，下面不顯得昏暗；綿延不絕而不可名狀，最終回歸於無形無物。", "noteIds": [ "c003", "c008", "c012", "c018", "c024", "c028", "c033", "c037", "c038", "c040", "c045", "c047", "c048", "c049" ], "noteCount": 14, "charNoteIds": [ "n007", "n008", "n009" ], "key": "laozi-14:s003", "n": 3 }, { "id": "s004", "paragraph": 1, "text": "是謂無狀之狀，無物之象，是謂惚恍。", "textSimp": "是谓无状之状，无物之象，是谓惚恍。", "translation": "这叫作没有形状的形状、没有物象的物象，叫作恍恍惚惚。", "translationTrad": "這叫作沒有形狀的形狀、沒有物象的物象，叫作恍恍惚惚。", "noteIds": [ "c004", "c008", "c013", "c019", "c025", "c029", "c034", "c037", "c038", "c041", "c045", "c047", "c048", "c049" ], "noteCount": 14, "charNoteIds": [ "n010" ], "key": "laozi-14:s004", "n": 4 }, { "id": "s005", "paragraph": 1, "text": "迎之不見其首，隨之不見其後。", "textSimp": "迎之不见其首，随之不见其后。", "translation": "迎着它看不见它的头，跟着它看不见它的尾。", "translationTrad": "迎著它看不見它的頭，跟著它看不見它的尾。", "noteIds": [ "c005", "c014", "c020", "c026", "c035", "c037", "c038", "c042", "c046", "c047", "c048", "c049" ], "noteCount": 12, "charNoteIds": [ "n011", "n012" ], "key": "laozi-14:s005", "n": 5 }, { "id": "s006", "paragraph": 1, "text": "執古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是謂道紀。", "textSimp": "执古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是谓道纪。", "translation": "把握亘古以来的道，用来驾驭当今的具体事物；能知道古始，就叫作道的纲纪。", "translationTrad": "把握亙古以來的道，用來駕馭當今的具體事物；能知道古始，就叫作道的綱紀。", "noteIds": [ "c006", "c009", "c015", "c021", "c027", "c030", "c036", "c037", "c038", "c043", "c046", "c047", "c048", "c049" ], "noteCount": 14, "charNoteIds": [ "n013" ], "key": "laozi-14:s006", "n": 6 } ], "commentaries": [ { "id": "c001", "block": 0, "source": "heshanggong", "target": { "start": "s001", "end": "s001" }, "lemma": "視之不見，名曰夷；聽之不聞，名曰希；搏之不得，名曰微", "kind": "note", "text": "無色曰夷。言一無彩色，不可得而視之矣。無聲曰希。言一無音聲，不得聽而聞之矣。無形曰微。言一無體，不可搏持而得之。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "河上公《老子道德經章句》", "textSimp": "无色曰夷。言一无彩色，不可得而视之矣。无声曰希。言一无音声，不得听而闻之矣。无形曰微。言一无体，不可搏持而得之。", "citationFull": "河上公《老子道德經章句》", "citationSimp": "河上公《老子道德经章句》", "lemmaSimp": "视之不见，名曰夷；听之不闻，名曰希；搏之不得，名曰微" }, { "id": "c002", "block": 0, "source": "heshanggong", "target": { "start": "s002", "end": "s002" }, "lemma": "此三者不可致詰，故混而為一", "kind": "note", "text": "三者，夷、希、微也。不可致詰者，謂無色，無聲，無形，口不能言，書不能傳，受之以靜，求之以神，不可詰問而能得也。混，合也。故三名合而為一。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "河上公《老子道德經章句》", "textSimp": "三者，夷、希、微也。不可致诘者，谓无色，无声，无形，口不能言，书不能传，受之以静，求之以神，不可诘问而能得也。混，合也。故三名合而为一。", "citationFull": "河上公《老子道德經章句》", "citationSimp": "河上公《老子道德经章句》", "lemmaSimp": "此三者不可致诘，故混而为一" }, { "id": "c003", "block": 0, "source": "heshanggong", "target": { "start": "s003", "end": "s003" }, "lemma": "其上不皦，其下不昧，繩繩不可名，復歸於無物", "kind": "note", "text": "言一在天上，不皎皎光明，上下無窮極也。言一在天下，不昧昧有所暗冥。繩繩者，動行無窮極也。不可名者，非一色也，不可以青黃赤白黑別也；非一聲也，不可以宮商角徵羽聽也；非一形也，不可以長短小大度也。物，質也。物當歸之以無質。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "河上公《老子道德經章句》", "textSimp": "言一在天上，不皎皎光明，上下无穷极也。言一在天下，不昧昧有所暗冥。绳绳者，动行无穷极也。不可名者，非一色也，不可以青黄赤白黑别也；非一声也，不可以宫商角徵羽听也；非一形也，不可以长短小大度也。物，质也。物当归之以无质。", "citationFull": "河上公《老子道德經章句》", "citationSimp": "河上公《老子道德经章句》", "lemmaSimp": "其上不皦，其下不昧，绳绳不可名，复归于无物" }, { "id": "c004", "block": 0, "source": "heshanggong", "target": { "start": "s004", "end": "s004" }, "lemma": "是謂無狀之狀，無物之象，是謂惚恍", "kind": "note", "text": "言一無形狀，而能為萬物作形狀。一無物質，而為萬物設形象。言一忽忽恍恍，若存若亡，不可得見。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "河上公《老子道德經章句》", "textSimp": "言一无形状，而能为万物作形状。一无物质，而为万物设形象。言一忽忽恍恍，若存若亡，不可得见。", "citationFull": "河上公《老子道德經章句》", "citationSimp": "河上公《老子道德经章句》", "lemmaSimp": "是谓无状之状，无物之象，是谓惚恍" }, { "id": "c005", "block": 0, "source": "heshanggong", "target": { "start": "s005", "end": "s005" }, "lemma": "迎之不見其首，隨之不見其後", "kind": "note", "text": "一無端末，不可預待也。除情去欲，一自歸之。言一無影跡，不可得而見。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "河上公《老子道德經章句》", "textSimp": "一无端末，不可预待也。除情去欲，一自归之。言一无影迹，不可得而见。", "citationFull": "河上公《老子道德經章句》", "citationSimp": "河上公《老子道德经章句》", "lemmaSimp": "迎之不见其首，随之不见其后" }, { "id": "c006", "block": 0, "source": "heshanggong", "target": { "start": "s006", "end": "s006" }, "lemma": "執古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是謂道紀", "kind": "note", "text": "聖人執古之道，生一以御萬物，知今當有一也。人能知上古本始有一，是謂知道之紀綱也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "河上公《老子道德經章句》", "textSimp": "圣人执古之道，生一以御万物，知今当有一也。人能知上古本始有一，是谓知道之纪纲也。", "citationFull": "河上公《老子道德經章句》", "citationSimp": "河上公《老子道德经章句》", "lemmaSimp": "执古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是谓道纪" }, { "id": "c007", "block": 0, "source": "wangbi", "target": { "start": "s001", "end": "s002" }, "lemma": "視之不見，名曰夷；聽之不聞，名曰希；搏之不得，名曰微。此三者不可致詰，故混而為一", "kind": "note", "text": "無狀無象，無聲無響，故能無所不通，無所不往，不得而知，更以我耳目體不知為名，故不可致詰，混而為一也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "王弼《老子道德經注》", "textSimp": "无状无象，无声无响，故能无所不通，无所不往，不得而知，更以我耳目体不知为名，故不可致诘，混而为一也。", "citationFull": "王弼《老子道德經注》", "citationSimp": "王弼《老子道德经注》", "lemmaSimp": "视之不见，名曰夷；听之不闻，名曰希；搏之不得，名曰微。此三者不可致诘，故混而为一" }, { "id": "c008", "block": 0, "source": "wangbi", "target": { "start": "s003", "end": "s004" }, "lemma": "其上不皦，其下不昧，繩繩不可名，復歸於無物。是謂無狀之狀，無物之象，是謂惚恍", "kind": "note", "text": "欲言無邪，而物由以成；欲言有邪，而不見其形，故曰無狀之狀，無物之象也。是謂惚恍，不可得而定也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "王弼《老子道德經注》", "textSimp": "欲言无邪，而物由以成；欲言有邪，而不见其形，故曰无状之状，无物之象也。是谓惚恍，不可得而定也。", "citationFull": "王弼《老子道德經注》", "citationSimp": "王弼《老子道德经注》", "lemmaSimp": "其上不皦，其下不昧，绳绳不可名，复归于无物。是谓无状之状，无物之象，是谓惚恍" }, { "id": "c009", "block": 0, "source": "wangbi", "target": { "start": "s006", "end": "s006" }, "lemma": "執古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是謂道紀", "kind": "note", "text": "無形無名者，萬物之宗也。雖今古不同，時移俗易，故莫不由乎此以成其治者也，故可執古之道以御今之有。上古雖遠，其道存焉，故雖在今可以知古始也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "王弼《老子道德經注》", "textSimp": "无形无名者，万物之宗也。虽今古不同，时移俗易，故莫不由乎此以成其治者也，故可执古之道以御今之有。上古虽远，其道存焉，故虽在今可以知古始也。", "citationFull": "王弼《老子道德經注》", "citationSimp": "王弼《老子道德经注》", "lemmaSimp": "执古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是谓道纪" }, { "id": "c010", "block": 0, "source": "chengxuanying", "target": { "start": "s001", "end": "s001" }, "lemma": "視之不見，名曰夷；聽之不聞，名曰希；搏之不得，名曰微", "kind": "note", "text": "夷，平也。言至道微妙，體非五色，不可以眼識求，故視之不見。若其有色，色則參差；只為無色，故夷然平等也。希，簡少也。體非宮商，不可以耳根聽，故曰希也。搏，觸也；微，妙也。言體非形質，不可搏觸而得，故名微妙也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "成玄英《老子道德經義疏》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "textSimp": "夷，平也。言至道微妙，体非五色，不可以眼识求，故视之不见。若其有色，色则参差；只为无色，故夷然平等也。希，简少也。体非宫商，不可以耳根听，故曰希也。搏，触也；微，妙也。言体非形质，不可搏触而得，故名微妙也。", "citationFull": "成玄英《老子道德經義疏》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "citationSimp": "成玄英《老子道德经义疏》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "lemmaSimp": "视之不见，名曰夷；听之不闻，名曰希；搏之不得，名曰微" }, { "id": "c011", "block": 0, "source": "chengxuanying", "target": { "start": "s002", "end": "s002" }, "lemma": "此三者不可致詰，故混而為一", "kind": "note", "text": "三者，即夷、希、微也。致，得也；詰，責也；混，合也。真而應，即散一以為三；應而真，即混三以歸一。一三三一，不一不異，故不可致詰。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "成玄英《老子道德經義疏》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "textSimp": "三者，即夷、希、微也。致，得也；诘，责也；混，合也。真而应，即散一以为三；应而真，即混三以归一。一三三一，不一不异，故不可致诘。", "citationFull": "成玄英《老子道德經義疏》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "citationSimp": "成玄英《老子道德经义疏》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "lemmaSimp": "此三者不可致诘，故混而为一" }, { "id": "c012", "block": 0, "source": "chengxuanying", "target": { "start": "s003", "end": "s003" }, "lemma": "其上不皦，其下不昧，繩繩不可名，復歸於無物", "kind": "note", "text": "皎，明也；昧，闇也。言至道幽微，非愚非智，昇三清之上不益其明，墜九幽之下不加其闇，所謂不增不減，其在茲乎。繩繩，正直也，猶繩墨之義也。言聖人既能政理，復能政他，故云不可執名求理，故不可名也。又解：繩繩，運動之貌也。言至道運轉天地，陶鑄生靈，而視聽莫尋，故不可名也。復歸者，還源也；無物者，妙本也。夫應機降跡，即可見可聞；復本歸根，即無名無相，故言復歸於無物也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "成玄英《老子道德經義疏》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "textSimp": "皎，明也；昧，暗也。言至道幽微，非愚非智，升三清之上不益其明，坠九幽之下不加其暗，所谓不增不减，其在兹乎。绳绳，正直也，犹绳墨之义也。言圣人既能政理，复能政他，故云不可执名求理，故不可名也。又解：绳绳，运动之貌也。言至道运转天地，陶铸生灵，而视听莫寻，故不可名也。复归者，还源也；无物者，妙本也。夫应机降迹，即可见可闻；复本归根，即无名无相，故言复归于无物也。", "citationFull": "成玄英《老子道德經義疏》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "citationSimp": "成玄英《老子道德经义疏》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "lemmaSimp": "其上不皦，其下不昧，绳绳不可名，复归于无物" }, { "id": "c013", "block": 0, "source": "chengxuanying", "target": { "start": "s004", "end": "s004" }, "lemma": "是謂無狀之狀，無物之象，是謂惚恍", "kind": "note", "text": "狀，貌；象，形。妙本希夷，故稱無狀、無物；亦能生化，故云狀之、象之。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "成玄英《老子道德經義疏》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "textSimp": "状，貌；象，形。妙本希夷，故称无状、无物；亦能生化，故云状之、象之。", "citationFull": "成玄英《老子道德經義疏》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "citationSimp": "成玄英《老子道德经义疏》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "lemmaSimp": "是谓无状之状，无物之象，是谓惚恍" }, { "id": "c014", "block": 0, "source": "chengxuanying", "target": { "start": "s005", "end": "s005" }, "lemma": "迎之不見其首，隨之不見其後", "kind": "note", "text": "迎不見其首，明道非古無始也；隨不見其後，明道非今無終也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "成玄英《老子道德經義疏》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "textSimp": "迎不见其首，明道非古无始也；随不见其后，明道非今无终也。", "citationFull": "成玄英《老子道德經義疏》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "citationSimp": "成玄英《老子道德经义疏》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "lemmaSimp": "迎之不见其首，随之不见其后" }, { "id": "c015", "block": 0, "source": "chengxuanying", "target": { "start": "s006", "end": "s006" }, "lemma": "執古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是謂道紀", "kind": "note", "text": "執，持也。言聖人持太古無名之道，調御今之有生也。古始即無名道也。若知無始無終而終而始，不今不古而古而今，用斯古道以御今世者，可謂至道之綱紀也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "成玄英《老子道德經義疏》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "textSimp": "执，持也。言圣人持太古无名之道，调御今之有生也。古始即无名道也。若知无始无终而终而始，不今不古而古而今，用斯古道以御今世者，可谓至道之纲纪也。", "citationFull": "成玄英《老子道德經義疏》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "citationSimp": "成玄英《老子道德经义疏》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "lemmaSimp": "执古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是谓道纪" }, { "id": "c016", "block": 0, "source": "tangxuanzong", "target": { "start": "s001", "end": "s001" }, "lemma": "視之不見，名曰夷；聽之不聞，名曰希，搏之不得，名曰微", "kind": "note", "text": "此明道也。夷，平易也。道非色，故視不可見；以其於無色之中而能色，故名曰夷。希者，聲之微也。道非聲，故聽之不聞；以其於無聲之中獨能和焉，故名曰希也。搏，執持也；微，妙色也。道無形，故執持不得；以其於無形之中而能形焉，故名曰微也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》", "textSimp": "此明道也。夷，平易也。道非色，故视不可见；以其于无色之中而能色，故名曰夷。希者，声之微也。道非声，故听之不闻；以其于无声之中独能和焉，故名曰希也。搏，执持也；微，妙色也。道无形，故执持不得；以其于无形之中而能形焉，故名曰微也。", "citationFull": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》", "citationSimp": "唐玄宗《道德真经注疏》", "lemmaSimp": "视之不见，名曰夷；听之不闻，名曰希，搏之不得，名曰微" }, { "id": "c017", "block": 0, "source": "tangxuanzong", "target": { "start": "s002", "end": "s002" }, "lemma": "此三者不可致詰，故混而為一", "kind": "note", "text": "三者將以詰道，道非聲色形法，故詰不可得，但得夷希微耳。道非希微，故復混而為一也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》", "textSimp": "三者将以诘道，道非声色形法，故诘不可得，但得夷希微耳。道非希微，故复混而为一也。", "citationFull": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》", "citationSimp": "唐玄宗《道德真经注疏》", "lemmaSimp": "此三者不可致诘，故混而为一" }, { "id": "c018", "block": 0, "source": "tangxuanzong", "target": { "start": "s003", "end": "s003" }, "lemma": "其上不皦，其下不昧，繩繩不可名，復歸於無物", "kind": "note", "text": "在上者必明，在下者必昧；唯道於上非上，在上亦不明；於下非下，在下亦不昧也。繩繩者，運動不絕之意。不皎不昧，運動無窮，生物之功，名目不得；非物能物，故常生物而未始有物，妙本湛然，故云復歸於無物。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》", "textSimp": "在上者必明，在下者必昧；唯道于上非上，在上亦不明；于下非下，在下亦不昧也。绳绳者，运动不绝之意。不皎不昧，运动无穷，生物之功，名目不得；非物能物，故常生物而未始有物，妙本湛然，故云复归于无物。", "citationFull": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》", "citationSimp": "唐玄宗《道德真经注疏》", "lemmaSimp": "其上不皦，其下不昧，绳绳不可名，复归于无物" }, { "id": "c019", "block": 0, "source": "tangxuanzong", "target": { "start": "s004", "end": "s004" }, "lemma": "是謂無狀之狀，無物之象，是謂惚恍", "kind": "note", "text": "是謂無形狀之狀，無物質之象。不可名有，不可名無，無有難名，故謂之惚恍也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》", "textSimp": "是谓无形状之状，无物质之象。不可名有，不可名无，无有难名，故谓之惚恍也。", "citationFull": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》", "citationSimp": "唐玄宗《道德真经注疏》", "lemmaSimp": "是谓无状之状，无物之象，是谓惚恍" }, { "id": "c020", "block": 0, "source": "tangxuanzong", "target": { "start": "s005", "end": "s005" }, "lemma": "迎之不見其首，隨之不見其後", "kind": "note", "text": "無始，故迎之不見其首；無終，故隨之不見其後。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》", "textSimp": "无始，故迎之不见其首；无终，故随之不见其后。", "citationFull": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》", "citationSimp": "唐玄宗《道德真经注疏》", "lemmaSimp": "迎之不见其首，随之不见其后" }, { "id": "c021", "block": 0, "source": "tangxuanzong", "target": { "start": "s006", "end": "s006" }, "lemma": "執古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是謂道紀", "kind": "note", "text": "執古無為之道，以御今有為之事，則還反淳樸矣。能知古始所行，是謂道化之綱紀也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》", "textSimp": "执古无为之道，以御今有为之事，则还反淳朴矣。能知古始所行，是谓道化之纲纪也。", "citationFull": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》", "citationSimp": "唐玄宗《道德真经注疏》", "lemmaSimp": "执古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是谓道纪" }, { "id": "c022", "block": 0, "source": "tangxuanzong", "target": { "start": "s001", "end": "s001" }, "lemma": "視之不見，名曰夷；聽之不聞，名曰希；搏之不得，名曰微", "kind": "shu", "text": "此章明道也。夫視之者以色求道，聽之者以聲求道，搏之者以形求道；道非色聲形法，故求竟不得。以不得故，欲謂之無，乃於無色之中能應眾色，無聲之中能和眾聲，無形之中能狀眾形，是有無色之色、無聲之聲、無形之形，故謂之夷希微。夷希微者，所謂明道而非道也。夷，平易也；希者，聲之微妙也；搏，執持也。", "authorNote": "御疏", "citation": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》", "textSimp": "此章明道也。夫视之者以色求道，听之者以声求道，搏之者以形求道；道非色声形法，故求竟不得。以不得故，欲谓之无，乃于无色之中能应众色，无声之中能和众声，无形之中能状众形，是有无色之色、无声之声、无形之形，故谓之夷希微。夷希微者，所谓明道而非道也。夷，平易也；希者，声之微妙也；搏，执持也。", "citationFull": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》（御疏）", "citationSimp": "唐玄宗《道德真经注疏》", "authorNoteSimp": "御疏", "lemmaSimp": "视之不见，名曰夷；听之不闻，名曰希；搏之不得，名曰微" }, { "id": "c023", "block": 0, "source": "tangxuanzong", "target": { "start": "s002", "end": "s002" }, "lemma": "此三者不可致詰，故混而為一", "kind": "shu", "text": "此三者，希夷微也。致，得也；詰，責也；混，同也。妙本微妙，精一難名，色聲形法焉得詰責？欲以色聲形詰，但得夷希微耳。謂之夷希微則三世也，夷希微但假名；欲明道用，道非聲色形等，則夷希微復混同為一矣。", "authorNote": "御疏", "citation": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》", "textSimp": "此三者，希夷微也。致，得也；诘，责也；混，同也。妙本微妙，精一难名，色声形法焉得诘责？欲以色声形诘，但得夷希微耳。谓之夷希微则三世也，夷希微但假名；欲明道用，道非声色形等，则夷希微复混同为一矣。", "citationFull": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》（御疏）", "citationSimp": "唐玄宗《道德真经注疏》", "authorNoteSimp": "御疏", "lemmaSimp": "此三者不可致诘，故混而为一" }, { "id": "c024", "block": 0, "source": "tangxuanzong", "target": { "start": "s003", "end": "s003" }, "lemma": "其上不皦，其下不昧，繩繩不可名，復歸於無物", "kind": "shu", "text": "皎，明也；昧，暗也。夫形質之物皆有定方，在上者則明，在下者則昧；唯妙本惚恍，不可定名，則在上亦不明，在下亦不昧，而能上能下，能明能昧，非天下之至賾，其孰能與於此？繩繩者，運動不絕之意也。妙本生化，運動無窮，生物之功，強名不得；物物而不物，生生而不生，尋責不得，則妙本湛然，未曾有物，故云復歸於無物也。", "authorNote": "御疏", "citation": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》", "textSimp": "皎，明也；昧，暗也。夫形质之物皆有定方，在上者则明，在下者则昧；唯妙本惚恍，不可定名，则在上亦不明，在下亦不昧，而能上能下，能明能昧，非天下之至赜，其孰能与于此？绳绳者，运动不绝之意也。妙本生化，运动无穷，生物之功，强名不得；物物而不物，生生而不生，寻责不得，则妙本湛然，未曾有物，故云复归于无物也。", "citationFull": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》（御疏）", "citationSimp": "唐玄宗《道德真经注疏》", "authorNoteSimp": "御疏", "lemmaSimp": "其上不皦，其下不昧，绳绳不可名，复归于无物" }, { "id": "c025", "block": 0, "source": "tangxuanzong", "target": { "start": "s004", "end": "s004" }, "lemma": "是謂無狀之狀，無物之象，是謂惚恍", "kind": "shu", "text": "狀，形狀也；象，物象也。言妙本混成，本無形質，而萬化資稟，品物流形，斯可謂有無狀之形狀、有無物之物象，不可名為有，亦不可格之於無，無有難名，故謂之惚恍。", "authorNote": "御疏", "citation": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》", "textSimp": "状，形状也；象，物象也。言妙本混成，本无形质，而万化资禀，品物流形，斯可谓有无状之形状、有无物之物象，不可名为有，亦不可格之于无，无有难名，故谓之惚恍。", "citationFull": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》（御疏）", "citationSimp": "唐玄宗《道德真经注疏》", "authorNoteSimp": "御疏", "lemmaSimp": "是谓无状之状，无物之象，是谓惚恍" }, { "id": "c026", "block": 0, "source": "tangxuanzong", "target": { "start": "s005", "end": "s005" }, "lemma": "迎之不見其首，隨之不見其後", "kind": "shu", "text": "至精無形，至大可圍，故迎之者不得其首，隨之者不得其後。無首則無始，無後即無終，無始無終，故非隨迎所得也。", "authorNote": "御疏", "citation": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》", "textSimp": "至精无形，至大可围，故迎之者不得其首，随之者不得其后。无首则无始，无后即无终，无始无终，故非随迎所得也。", "citationFull": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》（御疏）", "citationSimp": "唐玄宗《道德真经注疏》", "authorNoteSimp": "御疏", "lemmaSimp": "迎之不见其首，随之不见其后" }, { "id": "c027", "block": 0, "source": "tangxuanzong", "target": { "start": "s006", "end": "s006" }, "lemma": "執古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是謂道紀", "kind": "shu", "text": "此明古先帝王能以無為道化以化人，故戒令能執守古之所行無為之化，以御理今之有為之事，則不言而化矣。前云執古之道，將引之使行；此云能知古始，明道行必化。故重云帝王能知古始，無為而理，當抱守淳樸，爰清爰靜者，是知為理道之綱紀也。", "authorNote": "御疏", "citation": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》", "textSimp": "此明古先帝王能以无为道化以化人，故戒令能执守古之所行无为之化，以御理今之有为之事，则不言而化矣。前云执古之道，将引之使行；此云能知古始，明道行必化。故重云帝王能知古始，无为而理，当抱守淳朴，爰清爰静者，是知为理道之纲纪也。", "citationFull": "唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》（御疏）", "citationSimp": "唐玄宗《道德真经注疏》", "authorNoteSimp": "御疏", "lemmaSimp": "执古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是谓道纪" }, { "id": "c028", "block": 0, "source": "yanzun", "target": { "start": "s003", "end": "s003" }, "lemma": "繩繩不可名，復歸於無物", "kind": "note", "text": "沉沉汎汎，復歸虛空，曲成萬物，皆得以存，窮微極妙，盡得以然，周流上下，莫睹其無也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "嚴遵《道德真經指歸》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "textSimp": "沉沉泛泛，复归虚空，曲成万物，皆得以存，穷微极妙，尽得以然，周流上下，莫睹其无也。", "citationFull": "嚴遵《道德真經指歸》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "citationSimp": "严遵《道德真经指归》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "lemmaSimp": "绳绳不可名，复归于无物" }, { "id": "c029", "block": 0, "source": "yanzun", "target": { "start": "s004", "end": "s004" }, "lemma": "是謂無狀之狀，無物之象，是謂惚恍", "kind": "note", "text": "無狀之狀，無所不狀；無象之象，無所不象。光於惚恍，無所不顯，大而若小，存而若亡也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "嚴遵《道德真經指歸》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "textSimp": "无状之状，无所不状；无象之象，无所不象。光于惚恍，无所不显，大而若小，存而若亡也。", "citationFull": "嚴遵《道德真經指歸》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "citationSimp": "严遵《道德真经指归》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "lemmaSimp": "是谓无状之状，无物之象，是谓惚恍" }, { "id": "c030", "block": 0, "source": "yanzun", "target": { "start": "s006", "end": "s006" }, "lemma": "執古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是謂道紀", "kind": "note", "text": "執古自然以御於今，不為夷狄變，則不為中國改容。一以知始，一以知終，仰制於道，物無不懸，無所不主，無所不臨，其職溥大，無所不然，為虛綱紀，天地祖宗也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "嚴遵《道德真經指歸》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "textSimp": "执古自然以御于今，不为夷狄变，则不为中国改容。一以知始，一以知终，仰制于道，物无不悬，无所不主，无所不临，其职溥大，无所不然，为虚纲纪，天地祖宗也。", "citationFull": "嚴遵《道德真經指歸》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "citationSimp": "严遵《道德真经指归》（《玄德纂疏》所引）", "lemmaSimp": "执古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是谓道纪" }, { "id": "c031", "block": 0, "source": "lirong", "target": { "start": "s001", "end": "s001" }, "lemma": "視之不見，名曰夷；聽之不聞，名曰希；搏之不得，名曰微", "kind": "note", "text": "道遠乎哉？眼所不見，聖人體之，獨見曉焉，名之曰夷。夷，平也，大道甚夷，坦然善謀也。大音希聲，耳所不聞，聖人洞之，獨聞和焉，名之曰希。玄教難遇，希言自然也。大象無形，難可搏觸，聖人玄悟，了達虛無，故言微。微者，機也，無也，動而應物，機也；妙絕有名，無也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "李榮《道德真經注》（《道藏》本）", "textSimp": "道远乎哉？眼所不见，圣人体之，独见晓焉，名之曰夷。夷，平也，大道甚夷，坦然善谋也。大音希声，耳所不闻，圣人洞之，独闻和焉，名之曰希。玄教难遇，希言自然也。大象无形，难可搏触，圣人玄悟，了达虚无，故言微。微者，机也，无也，动而应物，机也；妙绝有名，无也。", "citationFull": "李榮《道德真經注》（《道藏》本）", "citationSimp": "李荣《道德真经注》（《道藏》本）", "lemmaSimp": "视之不见，名曰夷；听之不闻，名曰希；搏之不得，名曰微" }, { "id": "c032", "block": 0, "source": "lirong", "target": { "start": "s002", "end": "s002" }, "lemma": "此三者不可致詰，故混而為一", "kind": "note", "text": "希、微、夷三者，俱非聲色，並絕形名，有無不足詰，長短莫能議，混沌無分，寄名為一。一不自一，由三故一；三不自三，由一故三。由一故三，三是一三；由三故一，一是三一。一不成一，三不成三；三不成三則無三，一不成一則無一。無一無三，自叶忘言之理；執三執一，翻滯玄通之教也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "李榮《道德真經注》（《道藏》本）", "textSimp": "希、微、夷三者，俱非声色，并绝形名，有无不足诘，长短莫能议，混沌无分，寄名为一。一不自一，由三故一；三不自三，由一故三。由一故三，三是一三；由三故一，一是三一。一不成一，三不成三；三不成三则无三，一不成一则无一。无一无三，自叶忘言之理；执三执一，翻滞玄通之教也。", "citationFull": "李榮《道德真經注》（《道藏》本）", "citationSimp": "李荣《道德真经注》（《道藏》本）", "lemmaSimp": "此三者不可致诘，故混而为一" }, { "id": "c033", "block": 0, "source": "lirong", "target": { "start": "s003", "end": "s003" }, "lemma": "其上不皦，其下不昧，乘乘不可名，復歸於無物", "kind": "note", "text": "皎，明也；昧，闇也。乘乘，猶汎汎也，乘物以遊而無繫也。言乎至道不皎不昧，不可以明闇名；非色非聲，不可以視聽得。希夷之理既寂，三一之致亦空；以超群有，故曰歸無。無無所有，何所歸復？須知無物，無物亦無，此則玄之又玄、遣之又遣也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "李榮《道德真經注》（《道藏》本）", "textSimp": "皎，明也；昧，暗也。乘乘，犹泛泛也，乘物以游而无系也。言乎至道不皎不昧，不可以明暗名；非色非声，不可以视听得。希夷之理既寂，三一之致亦空；以超群有，故曰归无。无所有，何所归复？须知无物，无物亦无，此则玄之又玄、遣之又遣也。", "citationFull": "李榮《道德真經注》（《道藏》本）", "citationSimp": "李荣《道德真经注》（《道藏》本）", "lemmaSimp": "其上不皦，其下不昧，乘乘不可名，复归于无物" }, { "id": "c034", "block": 0, "source": "lirong", "target": { "start": "s004", "end": "s004" }, "lemma": "是謂無狀之狀，無物之象，是謂惚恍", "kind": "note", "text": "超有物而歸無物，無物亦無；色視聽而契希夷，希夷還寂。恐迷塗之未悟，但執無形；示失路之有歸，更開有象。無狀之狀，此乃從體起用；無物之象，斯為息應還真。息應還真，攝跡歸本也；從體起用，自寂之動也。自寂之動，語其無也，俄然而有；攝跡歸本，言其有也，忽爾而無。忽爾而無，無非定無；怳然而有，有非定有。有無怳惚，無能名焉。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "李榮《道德真經注》（《道藏》本）", "textSimp": "超有物而归无物，无物亦无；色视听而契希夷，希夷还寂。恐迷涂之未悟，但执无形；示失路之有归，更开有象。无状之状，此乃从体起用；无物之象，斯为息应还真。息应还真，摄迹归本也；从体起用，自寂之动也。自寂之动，语其无也，俄然而有；摄迹归本，言其有也，忽尔而无。忽尔而无，无非定无；怳然而有，有非定有。有无怳惚，无能名焉。", "citationFull": "李榮《道德真經注》（《道藏》本）", "citationSimp": "李荣《道德真经注》（《道藏》本）", "lemmaSimp": "是谓无状之状，无物之象，是谓惚恍" }, { "id": "c035", "block": 0, "source": "lirong", "target": { "start": "s005", "end": "s005" }, "lemma": "迎之不見其首，隨之不見其後", "kind": "note", "text": "有也，有前可接；無也，無後可追。迎之不見，非有；隨之不見，非無也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "李榮《道德真經注》（《道藏》本）", "textSimp": "有也，有前可接；无也，无后可追。迎之不见，非有；随之不见，非无也。", "citationFull": "李榮《道德真經注》（《道藏》本）", "citationSimp": "李荣《道德真经注》（《道藏》本）", "lemmaSimp": "迎之不见其首，随之不见其后" }, { "id": "c036", "block": 0, "source": "lirong", "target": { "start": "s006", "end": "s006" }, "lemma": "執古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是謂道紀", "kind": "note", "text": "御，正也。古道無為，正也；今道有為，邪也。聖人持無為之道以正有為，息澆薄之風，反淳和之化也。玄古之道難知，無為之風罕悟，上御下以正，下從上以敬。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "李榮《道德真經注》（《道藏》本）", "textSimp": "御，正也。古道无为，正也；今道有为，邪也。圣人持无为之道以正有为，息浇薄之风，反淳和之化也。玄古之道难知，无为之风罕悟，上御下以正，下从上以敬。", "citationFull": "李榮《道德真經注》（《道藏》本）", "citationSimp": "李荣《道德真经注》（《道藏》本）", "lemmaSimp": "执古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是谓道纪" }, { "id": "c037", "block": 0, "source": "luxisheng", "target": { "start": "s001", "end": "s006" }, "lemma": "第十四章", "kind": "note", "text": "視之可見者色也，聽之可聞者聲也，搏之可得者形也，天地萬物皆有之，唯道在天地萬物之間，非色聲與形，故不可以耳目手足得。然以非形能形形、色色而聲聲，故強名之曰希夷微，而復非詰責之可得，則混此三者謂之為一。上有日月齊照而其光不皦，下與瓦礫同寂而其明不昧；繩繩然運行不絕，不可得而名之，雖千變萬化復歸於無物。然道體真精本非無物，但不可以視聽搏執而得耳，故謂之無質之狀、無形之象。言其狀則忽然若無，言其象則怳然若有。莫知其始，故迎之不見其首；莫知其終，故隨之不見其後。唯能執古無為之道、御今有為之名者，乃可以遺淳反樸，復於太古之初矣。能知太古之初淳樸之性，斯乃大道之綱紀、教化之都要也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "陸希聲《道德經傳》（《道藏》本）", "textSimp": "视之可见者色也，听之可闻者声也，搏之可得者形也，天地万物皆有之，唯道在天地万物之间，非色声与形，故不可以耳目手足得。然以非形能形形、色色而声声，故强名之曰希夷微，而复非诘责之可得，则混此三者谓之为一。上有日月齐照而其光不皦，下与瓦砾同寂而其明不昧；绳绳然运行不绝，不可得而名之，虽千变万化复归于无物。然道体真精本非无物，但不可以视听搏执而得耳，故谓之无质之状、无形之象。言其状则忽然若无，言其象则怳然若有。莫知其始，故迎之不见其首；莫知其终，故随之不见其后。唯能执古无为之道、御今有为之名者，乃可以遗淳反朴，复于太古之初矣。能知太古之初淳朴之性，斯乃大道之纲纪、教化之都要也。", "citationFull": "陸希聲《道德經傳》（《道藏》本）", "citationSimp": "陆希声《道德经传》（《道藏》本）", "lemmaSimp": "第十四章" }, { "id": "c038", "block": 0, "source": "lvhuiqing", "target": { "start": "s001", "end": "s006" }, "lemma": "第十四章", "kind": "note", "text": "視者無有也，故視之不見；雖不見也，然能玄能黃，不可名之以無色也，曰夷而已。聽者無有也，故聽之不聞；雖不聞也，然能宮能商，不可名之以無聲也，曰希而已。搏者無有也，故搏之不得；雖不得也，然能陰能陽，能柔能剛，能短能長，能圓能方，能生能死，能暑能涼，能浮能沉，能出能沒，能甘能苦，能羶能香，不可名之以無形也，曰微而已。凡物求之而不得者，或可以致詰而得之；此三者終不可致詰者也。不可以致詰，則隳聰明、離形去智而吾得之矣，則視也、聽也、搏也混而為一矣。視以目，聽以耳，搏以心；混而為一，則耳如目、目如耳、心如耳目矣。夫失道者上見光而下為土；吾得之也，其上非光也，故不皦；其下非土也，故不昧。繩繩兮調直而有信，雖有信也而不可名，故復歸於無物而已。雖無物也，是謂無狀之狀、無物之象，而未嘗無物也，是謂惚恍。則不皦，不皦則疑於無物也，而非無物也；恍則不昧，不昧則疑於有物也，而非有物也。其始無前，故迎之而不見其首；其卒無尾，故隨之而不見其後。無前無後，則不古不今矣；雖不古不今，而未嘗無古今也，則長於上古而不為老者，吾得之以日用矣。故曰執古之道以御今之有。所謂古者非異於今也，以知古之所自始也；所謂今者非異於古也，以知今之所從來也。誠知古之所自始，則知今之所從來矣。始無所自，來無所從，所謂無端之紀也。無端之紀者，道紀也。道不可執，得此則可以執之以為德矣；執德之謂紀。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "呂惠卿《道德真經傳》（《道藏》本）", "textSimp": "视者无有也，故视之不见；虽不见也，然能玄能黄，不可名之以无色也，曰夷而已。听者无有也，故听之不闻；虽不闻也，然能宫能商，不可名之以无声也，曰希而已。搏者无有也，故搏之不得；虽不得也，然能阴能阳，能柔能刚，能短能长，能圆能方，能生能死，能暑能凉，能浮能沉，能出能没，能甘能苦，能膻能香，不可名之以无形也，曰微而已。凡物求之而不得者，或可以致诘而得之；此三者终不可致诘者也。不可以致诘，则隳聪明、离形去智而吾得之矣，则视也、听也、搏也混而为一矣。视以目，听以耳，搏以心；混而为一，则耳如目、目如耳、心如耳目矣。夫失道者上见光而下为土；吾得之也，其上非光也，故不皦；其下非土也，故不昧。绳绳兮调直而有信，虽有信也而不可名，故复归于无物而已。虽无物也，是谓无状之状、无物之象，而未尝无物也，是谓惚恍。则不皦，不皦则疑于无物也，而非无物也；恍则不昧，不昧则疑于有物也，而非有物也。其始无前，故迎之而不见其首；其卒无尾，故随之而不见其后。无前无后，则不古不今矣；虽不古不今，而未尝无古今也，则长于上古而不为老者，吾得之以日用矣。故曰执古之道以御今之有。所谓古者非异于今也，以知古之所自始也；所谓今者非异于古也，以知今之所从来也。诚知古之所自始，则知今之所从来矣。始无所自，来无所从，所谓无端之纪也。无端之纪者，道纪也。道不可执，得此则可以执之以为德矣；执德之谓纪。", "citationFull": "呂惠卿《道德真經傳》（《道藏》本）", "citationSimp": "吕惠卿《道德真经传》（《道藏》本）", "lemmaSimp": "第十四章" }, { "id": "c039", "block": 0, "source": "suzhe", "target": { "start": "s001", "end": "s002" }, "lemma": "視之不見，名曰夷；聽之不聞，名曰希；搏之不得，名曰微。此三者不可致詰，故混而為一", "kind": "note", "text": "視之而見者色也，所以見色者不可見也；聽之而聞者聲也，所以聞聲者不可聞也；搏之而得者觸也，所以得觸者不可得也。此三者雖有智者莫能詰也，要必混而歸於一而後可爾。所謂一者，性也；三者，性之用也。人始有性而已，及其與物構，然後分裂四出，為視、為聽、為觸，日用而不知反其本；非復混而為一，則日遠矣。若推而廣之，則佛氏所謂六入皆然矣。《首楞嚴》有云：反流全一，六用不行。此之謂也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "蘇轍《老子解》", "textSimp": "视之而见者色也，所以见色者不可见也；听之而闻者声也，所以闻声者不可闻也；搏之而得者触也，所以得触者不可得也。此三者虽有智者莫能诘也，要必混而归于一而后可尔。所谓一者，性也；三者，性之用也。人始有性而已，及其与物构，然后分裂四出，为视、为听、为触，日用而不知反其本；非复混而为一，则日远矣。若推而广之，则佛氏所谓六入皆然矣。《首楞严》有云：反流全一，六用不行。此之谓也。", "citationFull": "蘇轍《老子解》", "citationSimp": "苏辙《老子解》", "lemmaSimp": "视之不见，名曰夷；听之不闻，名曰希；搏之不得，名曰微。此三者不可致诘，故混而为一" }, { "id": "c040", "block": 0, "source": "suzhe", "target": { "start": "s003", "end": "s003" }, "lemma": "其上不皦，其下不昧，繩繩不可名，復歸於無物", "kind": "note", "text": "物之有形者皆麗於陰陽，故上皦下昧，不可逃也；道雖在上而不皦，雖在下而不昧，不可以形數推也。繩繩，運而不絕也。人見其運而不絕，則以為有物矣，不知其卒歸於無也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "蘇轍《老子解》", "textSimp": "物之有形者皆丽于阴阳，故上皦下昧，不可逃也；道虽在上而不皦，虽在下而不昧，不可以形数推也。绳绳，运而不绝也。人见其运而不绝，则以为有物矣，不知其卒归于无也。", "citationFull": "蘇轍《老子解》", "citationSimp": "苏辙《老子解》", "lemmaSimp": "其上不皦，其下不昧，绳绳不可名，复归于无物" }, { "id": "c041", "block": 0, "source": "suzhe", "target": { "start": "s004", "end": "s004" }, "lemma": "是謂無狀之狀，無象之象，是謂惚恍", "kind": "note", "text": "狀其著也，象其微也。無狀之狀、無象之象，皆非無也；有無不可名，故謂之惚恍。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "蘇轍《老子解》", "textSimp": "状其着也，象其微也。无状之状、无象之象，皆非无也；有无不可名，故谓之惚恍。", "citationFull": "蘇轍《老子解》", "citationSimp": "苏辙《老子解》", "lemmaSimp": "是谓无状之状，无象之象，是谓惚恍" }, { "id": "c042", "block": 0, "source": "suzhe", "target": { "start": "s005", "end": "s005" }, "lemma": "迎之不見其首，隨之不見其後", "kind": "note", "text": "道無所不在，故無前後可見。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "蘇轍《老子解》", "textSimp": "道无所不在，故无前后可见。", "citationFull": "蘇轍《老子解》", "citationSimp": "苏辙《老子解》", "lemmaSimp": "迎之不见其首，随之不见其后" }, { "id": "c043", "block": 0, "source": "suzhe", "target": { "start": "s006", "end": "s006" }, "lemma": "執古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是謂道紀", "kind": "note", "text": "古者物之所從生也，有者物之今，則無者物之古也。執其所從生，則進退疾徐在我矣。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "蘇轍《老子解》", "textSimp": "古者物之所从生也，有者物之今，则无者物之古也。执其所从生，则进退疾徐在我矣。", "citationFull": "蘇轍《老子解》", "citationSimp": "苏辙《老子解》", "lemmaSimp": "执古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是谓道纪" }, { "id": "c044", "block": 0, "source": "wucheng", "target": { "start": "s001", "end": "s002" }, "lemma": "視之不見，名曰夷；聽之不聞，名曰希；搏之不得，名曰微。此三者不可致詰，故混而為一", "kind": "note", "text": "此章專言德跡之呈露者。目視之而易見，夷謂平夷，夷則泯沒無跡，故視之不見；聲之繁密者耳聽之而易聞，希謂希疏，希則間闊無聲，故聽之不聞；形之章大者手搏之而易得，微謂微茫，微則杳漠無形，故搏之不得。夷希微三者，雖欲究極言之而不可，故混同無所分別而名之為一。曰夷、曰希、曰微、曰一，皆指常德而言也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "吳澄《道德真經注》", "textSimp": "此章专言德迹之呈露者。目视之而易见，夷谓平夷，夷则泯没无迹，故视之不见；声之繁密者耳听之而易闻，希谓希疏，希则间阔无声，故听之不闻；形之章大者手搏之而易得，微谓微茫，微则杳漠无形，故搏之不得。夷希微三者，虽欲究极言之而不可，故混同无所分别而名之为一。曰夷、曰希、曰微、曰一，皆指常德而言也。", "citationFull": "吳澄《道德真經注》", "citationSimp": "吴澄《道德真经注》", "lemmaSimp": "视之不见，名曰夷；听之不闻，名曰希；搏之不得，名曰微。此三者不可致诘，故混而为一" }, { "id": "c045", "block": 0, "source": "wucheng", "target": { "start": "s003", "end": "s004" }, "lemma": "其上不皦，其下不昧，繩繩不可名，復歸於無物。是謂無狀之狀，無象之象，是謂惚恍", "kind": "note", "text": "其亦謂德也。其上其下，猶《易》言形而上、形而下也。繩繩，往過來續而不絕也；復，反還也。無物指道而言。德之上，道也，道無名，故不皦；德之下，物也，物有形，故不昧。德在有無之間，雖若有名而不可名，反還其初，則歸於無物之道，《莊子》所謂德至同於初是也。道無物也，故無狀無象；德有名也，故可狀可象。然其狀其象亦非如物之有狀有象也，故曰無狀無象之象，似有似無，故曰惚恍。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "吳澄《道德真經注》", "textSimp": "其亦谓德也。其上其下，犹《易》言形而上、形而下也。绳绳，往过来续而不绝也；复，反还也。无物指道而言。德之上，道也，道无名，故不皦；德之下，物也，物有形，故不昧。德在有无之间，虽若有名而不可名，反还其初，则归于无物之道，《庄子》所谓德至同于初是也。道无物也，故无状无象；德有名也，故可状可象。然其状其象亦非如物之有状有象也，故曰无状无象之象，似有似无，故曰惚恍。", "citationFull": "吳澄《道德真經注》", "citationSimp": "吴澄《道德真经注》", "lemmaSimp": "其上不皦，其下不昧，绳绳不可名，复归于无物。是谓无状之状，无象之象，是谓惚恍" }, { "id": "c046", "block": 0, "source": "wucheng", "target": { "start": "s005", "end": "s006" }, "lemma": "迎之不見其首，隨之不見其後。執古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是謂道紀", "kind": "note", "text": "惟其惚恍不可名，故迎之於前、隨之於後而皆不可見。古謂在先，今謂在後，有謂萬物。德者其源出於道，其流溥於萬物，故曰執古之道以御今之有。古始者，道也，謂古先天地之所始也。道紀者，德也，謂道散為德，如理絲之縷，有條而不紊也。能知此道，則知此德為道之紀也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "吳澄《道德真經注》", "textSimp": "惟其惚恍不可名，故迎之于前、随之于后而皆不可见。古谓在先，今谓在后，有谓万物。德者其源出于道，其流溥于万物，故曰执古之道以御今之有。古始者，道也，谓古先天地之所始也。道纪者，德也，谓道散为德，如理丝之缕，有条而不紊也。能知此道，则知此德为道之纪也。", "citationFull": "吳澄《道德真經注》", "citationSimp": "吴澄《道德真经注》", "lemmaSimp": "迎之不见其首，随之不见其后。执古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是谓道纪" }, { "id": "c047", "block": 0, "source": "hanshan", "target": { "start": "s001", "end": "s006" }, "lemma": "第十四章", "kind": "note", "text": "此言大道體虛，超乎聲色名相思議之表，聖人執此以御世也。夷，無色也，故視之不可見；希，無聲也，故聽之不可聞；微，無相也，故搏之不可得。搏，取之也。此三者雖有此名，其實不可致詰。致詰，猶言思議。由其道體混融而不可分，故為一。其上日月不足以增其明，故不皦；皦，明也。其下幽暗不能以昏其明，故不昧。繩繩，猶綿綿不絕之意，謂道體雖綿綿不絕，其實不可名言；畢竟至虛，雖生而不有，故復歸於無物。杳冥之內而至精存焉，故曰無狀之狀；恍惚之中而似有物焉，故曰無象之象，是謂惚恍。此正《楞嚴》所謂罔象虛無、微細精想耳。由其此體，前觀無始，故迎之不見其首；後觀無終，故隨之不見其後。此乃古始之道也。上皆歷言大道之妙，下言得道之人。然聖人所以為聖人者，蓋執此妙道以御世，故曰執古之道以御今之有。吾人有能知此古始之道者，即是道統所繫也，故曰能知古始，是謂道紀。紀，綱紀，謂統緒也。", "authorNote": "節引", "citation": "釋德清《道德經解》", "textSimp": "此言大道体虚，超乎声色名相思议之表，圣人执此以御世也。夷，无色也，故视之不可见；希，无声也，故听之不可闻；微，无相也，故搏之不可得。搏，取之也。此三者虽有此名，其实不可致诘。致诘，犹言思议。由其道体混融而不可分，故为一。其上日月不足以增其明，故不皦；皦，明也。其下幽暗不能以昏其明，故不昧。绳绳，犹绵绵不绝之意，谓道体虽绵绵不绝，其实不可名言；毕竟至虚，虽生而不有，故复归于无物。杳冥之内而至精存焉，故曰无状之状；恍惚之中而似有物焉，故曰无象之象，是谓惚恍。此正《楞严》所谓罔象虚无、微细精想耳。由其此体，前观无始，故迎之不见其首；后观无终，故随之不见其后。此乃古始之道也。上皆历言大道之妙，下言得道之人。然圣人所以为圣人者，盖执此妙道以御世，故曰执古之道以御今之有。吾人有能知此古始之道者，即是道统所系也，故曰能知古始，是谓道纪。纪，纲纪，谓统绪也。", "citationFull": "釋德清《道德經解》（節引）", "citationSimp": "释德清《道德经解》", "authorNoteSimp": "节引", "lemmaSimp": "第十四章" }, { "id": "c048", "block": 0, "source": "weiyuan", "target": { "start": "s001", "end": "s006" }, "lemma": "第十四章", "kind": "note", "text": "本章文字多異同：「故混而為一」，蘇轍本「故」下有「復」字；「繩繩兮不可名」，王弼本無「兮」字；「復歸於無物」，蘇轍本「物」作「象」；「無象之象」，碑本無「是謂惚怳」四字。吳澄曰：此章專言德跡之呈露者，曰夷、曰希、曰微、曰一，皆指德而言也。德在有無之間，故雖若有名而不可名。無物指道而言，反還其初，則歸於無物之道，《莊子》所謂德同至於初是也。道紀者，德也。呂惠卿曰：無前後則無古今矣；無古今，則長於上古而不為老者，吾得之以日用矣。知今之所從來，則知古之所自始，所謂無端之紀也。道不可執，得此則可執之以為德矣，執德之謂道紀也。", "authorNote": "", "citation": "魏源《老子本義》", "textSimp": "本章文字多异同：「故混而为一」，苏辙本「故」下有「复」字；「绳绳兮不可名」，王弼本无「兮」字；「复归于无物」，苏辙本「物」作「象」；「无象之象」，碑本无「是谓惚怳」四字。吴澄曰：此章专言德迹之呈露者，曰夷、曰希、曰微、曰一，皆指德而言也。德在有无之间，故虽若有名而不可名。无物指道而言，反还其初，则归于无物之道，《庄子》所谓德同至于初是也。道纪者，德也。吕惠卿曰：无前后则无古今矣；无古今，则长于上古而不为老者，吾得之以日用矣。知今之所从来，则知古之所自始，所谓无端之纪也。道不可执，得此则可执之以为德矣，执德之谓道纪也。", "citationFull": "魏源《老子本義》", "citationSimp": "魏源《老子本义》", "lemmaSimp": "第十四章" }, { "id": "c049", "block": 0, "source": "wangfuzhi", "target": { "start": "s001", "end": "s006" }, "lemma": "第十四章", "kind": "note", "text": "物有間，人不知其間，故合之、背之，而物皆為患。道無間，人強分其間，故執之、別之，而道僅為名。以無間乘有間，終日遊而患與名去；患與名去，斯「無物」矣。夫有物者，或輕或重，或光或塵，或作或止，是謂無紀。一名為陰，一名為陽，而沖氣死；一名為仁，一名為義，而太和死。道也者，生於未陰未陽，而死於仁義者與！故離朱不能察黑白之交，師曠不能審宮商之會，慶忌不能攫空塵之隙，神禹不能皙天地之分。非至常者，何足以與於斯！", "authorNote": "", "citation": "王夫之《老子衍》", "textSimp": "物有间，人不知其间，故合之、背之，而物皆为患。道无间，人强分其间，故执之、别之，而道仅为名。以无间乘有间，终日游而患与名去；患与名去，斯「无物」矣。夫有物者，或轻或重，或光或尘，或作或止，是谓无纪。一名为阴，一名为阳，而冲气死；一名为仁，一名为义，而太和死。道也者，生于未阴未阳，而死于仁义者与！故离朱不能察黑白之交，师旷不能审宫商之会，庆忌不能攫空尘之隙，神禹不能皙天地之分。非至常者，何足以与于斯！", "citationFull": "王夫之《老子衍》", "citationSimp": "王夫之《老子衍》", "lemmaSimp": "第十四章" } ], "charNotes": [ { "id": "n001", "sentenceId": "s001", "start": 7, "end": 8, "char": "夷", "charSimp": "夷", "startSimp": 7, "endSimp": 8, "pinyin": "yí", "gloss": "平、平易；無色之稱。", "glossSimp": "平、平易；无色之称。", "general": "河上公注：「無色曰夷。」成玄英疏：「夷，平也。體非五色，不可以眼識求，故視之不見。」御注：「夷，平易也。道非色，故視不可見。」", "generalSimp": "河上公注：「无色曰夷。」成玄英疏：「夷，平也。体非五色，不可以眼识求，故视之不见。」御注：「夷，平易也。道非色，故视不可见。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "河上公注", "成玄英疏", "御注" ], "refsSimp": [ "河上公注", "成玄英疏", "御注" ] }, { "id": "n002", "sentenceId": "s001", "start": 16, "end": 17, "char": "希", "charSimp": "希", "startSimp": 16, "endSimp": 17, "pinyin": "xī", "gloss": "希少、稀微；無聲之稱。", "glossSimp": "希少、稀微；无声之称。", "general": "河上公注：「無聲曰希。」成玄英疏：「希，簡少也。體非宮商，不可以耳根聽。」御注：「希者，聲之微也。」", "generalSimp": "河上公注：「无声曰希。」成玄英疏：「希，简少也。体非宫商，不可以耳根听。」御注：「希者，声之微也。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "河上公注", "成玄英疏", "御注" ], "refsSimp": [ "河上公注", "成玄英疏", "御注" ] }, { "id": "n003", "sentenceId": "s001", "start": 18, "end": 19, "char": "搏", "charSimp": "搏", "startSimp": 18, "endSimp": 19, "pinyin": "bó", "gloss": "執持、觸摸。", "glossSimp": "执持、触摸。", "general": "御注：「搏，執持也。」成玄英疏：「搏，觸也。」李榮注：「大象無形，難可搏觸。」", "generalSimp": "御注：「搏，执持也。」成玄英疏：「搏，触也。」李荣注：「大象无形，难可搏触。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "御注", "成玄英疏", "李榮注" ], "refsSimp": [ "御注", "成玄英疏", "李荣注" ] }, { "id": "n004", "sentenceId": "s001", "start": 25, "end": 26, "char": "微", "charSimp": "微", "startSimp": 25, "endSimp": 26, "pinyin": "wēi", "gloss": "微茫、微妙；無形之稱。", "glossSimp": "微茫、微妙；无形之称。", "general": "河上公注：「無形曰微。」御注：「微，妙色也。道無形，故執持不得。」成玄英疏：「微，妙也。言體非形質，不可搏觸而得。」", "generalSimp": "河上公注：「无形曰微。」御注：「微，妙色也。道无形，故执持不得。」成玄英疏：「微，妙也。言体非形质，不可搏触而得。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "河上公注", "御注", "成玄英疏" ], "refsSimp": [ "河上公注", "御注", "成玄英疏" ] }, { "id": "n005", "sentenceId": "s002", "start": 5, "end": 7, "char": "致詰", "charSimp": "致诘", "startSimp": 5, "endSimp": 7, "pinyin": "zhì jié", "gloss": "窮究追問。致，得；詰，責問。", "glossSimp": "穷究追问。致，得；诘，责问。", "general": "御注：「三者將以詰道，道非聲色形法，故詰不可得。」御疏：「致，得也；詰，責也。」河上公注：「不可詰問而能得也。」", "generalSimp": "御注：「三者将以诘道，道非声色形法，故诘不可得。」御疏：「致，得也；诘，责也。」河上公注：「不可诘问而能得也。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "御注", "御疏", "河上公注" ], "refsSimp": [ "御注", "御疏", "河上公注" ] }, { "id": "n006", "sentenceId": "s002", "start": 9, "end": 13, "char": "混而為一", "charSimp": "混而为一", "startSimp": 9, "endSimp": 13, "pinyin": "hùn ér wéi yī", "gloss": "混同為一體。混，合。", "glossSimp": "混同为一体。混，合。", "general": "河上公注：「混，合也。故三名合而為一。」成玄英疏：「散一以為三，混三以歸一。」吳澄注：「混同無所分別而名之為一。」", "generalSimp": "河上公注：「混，合也。故三名合而为一。」成玄英疏：「散一以为三，混三以归一。」吴澄注：「混同无所分别而名之为一。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "河上公注", "成玄英疏", "吳澄注" ], "refsSimp": [ "河上公注", "成玄英疏", "吴澄注" ] }, { "id": "n007", "sentenceId": "s003", "start": 3, "end": 4, "char": "皦", "charSimp": "皦", "startSimp": 3, "endSimp": 4, "pinyin": "jiǎo", "gloss": "明亮、光明。", "glossSimp": "明亮、光明。", "general": "河上公注：「言一在天上，不皎皎光明。」御注：「皎，明也。」成玄英疏：「皎，明也；昧，闇也。」", "generalSimp": "河上公注：「言一在天上，不皎皎光明。」御注：「皎，明也。」成玄英疏：「皎，明也；昧，暗也。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "河上公注", "御注", "成玄英疏" ], "refsSimp": [ "河上公注", "御注", "成玄英疏" ] }, { "id": "n008", "sentenceId": "s003", "start": 8, "end": 9, "char": "昧", "charSimp": "昧", "startSimp": 8, "endSimp": 9, "pinyin": "mèi", "gloss": "昏暗、暗昧。", "glossSimp": "昏暗、暗昧。", "general": "河上公注：「言一在天下，不昧昧有所暗冥。」御注：「昧，暗也。」御疏：「在上者則明，在下者則昧。」", "generalSimp": "河上公注：「言一在天下，不昧昧有所暗冥。」御注：「昧，暗也。」御疏：「在上者则明，在下者则昧。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "河上公注", "御注", "御疏" ], "refsSimp": [ "河上公注", "御注", "御疏" ] }, { "id": "n009", "sentenceId": "s003", "start": 10, "end": 12, "char": "繩繩", "charSimp": "绳绳", "startSimp": 10, "endSimp": 12, "pinyin": "shéng shéng", "gloss": "綿延不絕、運動無窮。", "glossSimp": "绵延不绝、运动无穷。", "general": "河上公注：「繩繩者，動行無窮極也。」御注：「繩繩者，運動不絕之意。」蘇轍注：「繩繩，運而不絕也。」", "generalSimp": "河上公注：「绳绳者，动行无穷极也。」御注：「绳绳者，运动不绝之意。」苏辙注：「绳绳，运而不绝也。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "河上公注", "御注", "蘇轍注" ], "refsSimp": [ "河上公注", "御注", "苏辙注" ] }, { "id": "n010", "sentenceId": "s004", "start": 14, "end": 16, "char": "惚恍", "charSimp": "惚恍", "startSimp": 14, "endSimp": 16, "pinyin": "hū huǎng", "gloss": "若有若無、不可定名。", "glossSimp": "若有若无、不可定名。", "general": "河上公注：「言一忽忽恍恍，若存若亡，不可得見。」御注：「不可名有，不可名無，無有難名，故謂之惚恍。」", "generalSimp": "河上公注：「言一忽忽恍恍，若存若亡，不可得见。」御注：「不可名有，不可名无，无有难名，故谓之惚恍。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "河上公注", "御注" ], "refsSimp": [ "河上公注", "御注" ] }, { "id": "n011", "sentenceId": "s005", "start": 4, "end": 6, "char": "其首", "charSimp": "其首", "startSimp": 4, "endSimp": 6, "pinyin": "qí shǒu", "gloss": "它的開頭、前端。", "glossSimp": "它的开头、前端。", "general": "御注：「無始，故迎之不見其首。」成玄英疏：「迎不見其首，明道非古無始也。」", "generalSimp": "御注：「无始，故迎之不见其首。」成玄英疏：「迎不见其首，明道非古无始也。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "御注", "成玄英疏" ], "refsSimp": [ "御注", "成玄英疏" ] }, { "id": "n012", "sentenceId": "s005", "start": 11, "end": 13, "char": "其後", "charSimp": "其后", "startSimp": 11, "endSimp": 13, "pinyin": "qí hòu", "gloss": "它的末尾、後端。", "glossSimp": "它的末尾、后端。", "general": "御注：「無終，故隨之不見其後。」成玄英疏：「隨不見其後，明道非今無終也。」", "generalSimp": "御注：「无终，故随之不见其后。」成玄英疏：「随不见其后，明道非今无终也。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "御注", "成玄英疏" ], "refsSimp": [ "御注", "成玄英疏" ] }, { "id": "n013", "sentenceId": "s006", "start": 18, "end": 20, "char": "道紀", "charSimp": "道纪", "startSimp": 18, "endSimp": 20, "pinyin": "dào jì", "gloss": "道的綱紀、統緒。", "glossSimp": "道的纲纪、统绪。", "general": "御注：「能知古始所行，是謂道化之綱紀也。」吳澄注：「道紀者，德也。謂道散為德，如理絲之縷，有條而不紊也。」", "generalSimp": "御注：「能知古始所行，是谓道化之纲纪也。」吴澄注：「道纪者，德也。谓道散为德，如理丝之缕，有条而不紊也。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "御注", "吳澄注" ], "refsSimp": [ "御注", "吴澄注" ] } ], "glossary": { "夷": "無色之稱；一說平易。", "希": "無聲之稱；一說希少、稀微。", "微": "無形之稱；一說微妙、微茫。", "致詰": "窮究追問。致，得；詰，責問。", "混而為一": "混同為一體。", "皦": "明亮、光明。", "昧": "昏暗、暗昧。", "繩繩": "綿延不絕、運動無窮。", "無狀之狀": "沒有形狀的形狀。", "無物之象": "沒有物象的物象。", "惚恍": "若有若無、不可定名。", "道紀": "道的綱紀、統緒。" }, "collations": [ { "sentenceId": "s001", "headword": "章次", "text": "河上公題「贊玄第十四」，唐玄宗題「視之不見章第十四」，呂惠卿、蘇轍並題第十四；吳澄、魏源合上章於前，此章在其本題為第十三章，王夫之仍題第十四章。本站從通行分章。", "source": "河上公《老子道德經章句》、唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》、呂惠卿《道德真經傳》、蘇轍《老子解》、吳澄《道德真經注》、魏源《老子本義》、王夫之《老子衍》", "textSimp": "河上公题「赞玄第十四」，唐玄宗题「视之不见章第十四」，吕惠卿、苏辙并题第十四；吴澄、魏源合上章于前，此章在其本题为第十三章，王夫之仍题第十四章。本站从通行分章。", "headwordSimp": "章次", "sourceSimp": "河上公《老子道德经章句》、唐玄宗《道德真经注疏》、吕惠卿《道德真经传》、苏辙《老子解》、吴澄《道德真经注》、魏源《老子本义》、王夫之《老子衍》", "id": "k001" }, { "sentenceId": "s001", "headword": "搏之不得與摶之不得", "text": "王弼、河上公、陸希聲、呂惠卿、蘇轍、吳澄、憨山、魏源本作「搏之不得」，唐玄宗御注、成玄英疏、李榮本作「摶之不得」；「搏」為搏取，「摶」為執持，義得兩通。正文從王弼本作「搏」。", "source": "王弼《老子道德經注》、河上公《老子道德經章句》、唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》、成玄英《老子道德經義疏》、李榮《道德真經注》、陸希聲《道德經傳》、呂惠卿《道德真經傳》、蘇轍《老子解》、吳澄《道德真經注》、釋德清《道德經解》、魏源《老子本義》", "textSimp": "王弼、河上公、陆希声、吕惠卿、苏辙、吴澄、憨山、魏源本作「搏之不得」，唐玄宗御注、成玄英疏、李荣本作「抟之不得」；「搏」为搏取，「抟」为执持，义得两通。正文从王弼本作「搏」。", "headwordSimp": "搏之不得与抟之不得", "sourceSimp": "王弼《老子道德经注》、河上公《老子道德经章句》、唐玄宗《道德真经注疏》、成玄英《老子道德经义疏》、李荣《道德真经注》、陆希声《道德经传》、吕惠卿《道德真经传》、苏辙《老子解》、吴澄《道德真经注》、释德清《道德经解》、魏源《老子本义》", "id": "k002" }, { "sentenceId": "s003", "headword": "繩繩與乘乘", "text": "王弼、河上公、唐玄宗御注、成玄英、蘇轍、吳澄、憨山、魏源本作「繩繩不可名」，李榮本作「乘乘不可名」，其注云「乘乘猶汎汎也，乘物以遊而無繫」。正文從王弼本。", "source": "王弼《老子道德經注》、河上公《老子道德經章句》、唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》、成玄英《老子道德經義疏》、李榮《道德真經注》、蘇轍《老子解》、吳澄《道德真經注》、釋德清《道德經解》、魏源《老子本義》", "textSimp": "王弼、河上公、唐玄宗御注、成玄英、苏辙、吴澄、憨山、魏源本作「绳绳不可名」，李荣本作「乘乘不可名」，其注云「乘乘犹泛泛也，乘物以游而无系」。正文从王弼本。", "headwordSimp": "绳绳与乘乘", "sourceSimp": "王弼《老子道德经注》、河上公《老子道德经章句》、唐玄宗《道德真经注疏》、成玄英《老子道德经义疏》、李荣《道德真经注》、苏辙《老子解》、吴澄《道德真经注》、释德清《道德经解》、魏源《老子本义》", "id": "k003" }, { "sentenceId": "s004", "headword": "無物之象與無象之象", "text": "王弼、河上公、唐玄宗御注、李榮、陸希聲、呂惠卿、憨山、王夫之本作「無物之象」，蘇轍、吳澄、魏源本作「無象之象」；蘇轍注「無狀之狀、無象之象」，吳澄注「無狀無象之象」。正文從王弼本。", "source": "王弼《老子道德經注》、河上公《老子道德經章句》、唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》、李榮《道德真經注》、陸希聲《道德經傳》、呂惠卿《道德真經傳》、蘇轍《老子解》、吳澄《道德真經注》、釋德清《道德經解》、魏源《老子本義》、王夫之《老子衍》", "textSimp": "王弼、河上公、唐玄宗御注、李荣、陆希声、吕惠卿、憨山、王夫之本作「无物之象」，苏辙、吴澄、魏源本作「无象之象」；苏辙注「无状之状、无象之象」，吴澄注「无状无象之象」。正文从王弼本。", "headwordSimp": "无物之象与无象之象", "sourceSimp": "王弼《老子道德经注》、河上公《老子道德经章句》、唐玄宗《道德真经注疏》、李荣《道德真经注》、陆希声《道德经传》、吕惠卿《道德真经传》、苏辙《老子解》、吴澄《道德真经注》、释德清《道德经解》、魏源《老子本义》、王夫之《老子衍》", "id": "k004" }, { "sentenceId": "s004", "headword": "惚恍異文", "text": "王弼、蘇轍、吳澄、呂惠卿本作「惚恍」，河上公、魏源本作「忽恍」「忽怳」，陸希聲本作「惚怳」，李榮本作「怳惚」。正文從王弼本。", "source": "王弼《老子道德經注》、河上公《老子道德經章句》、陸希聲《道德經傳》、呂惠卿《道德真經傳》、李榮《道德真經注》、蘇轍《老子解》、吳澄《道德真經注》、魏源《老子本義》", "textSimp": "王弼、苏辙、吴澄、吕惠卿本作「惚恍」，河上公、魏源本作「忽恍」「忽怳」，陆希声本作「惚怳」，李荣本作「怳惚」。正文从王弼本。", "headwordSimp": "惚恍异文", "sourceSimp": "王弼《老子道德经注》、河上公《老子道德经章句》、陆希声《道德经传》、吕惠卿《道德真经传》、李荣《道德真经注》、苏辙《老子解》、吴澄《道德真经注》、魏源《老子本义》", "id": "k005" }, { "sentenceId": "s006", "headword": "有有其事", "text": "王弼底本「執古之道以御今之有」下有「有有其事」四字，諸本無之，當是注文羼入或衍文。正文逕刪，存此待考。", "source": "王弼《老子道德經注》", "textSimp": "王弼底本「执古之道以御今之有」下有「有有其事」四字，诸本无之，当是注文羼入或衍文。正文迳删，存此待考。", "headwordSimp": "有有其事", "sourceSimp": "王弼《老子道德经注》", "id": "k006" }, { "sentenceId": "s006", "headword": "以知古始與能知古始", "text": "河上公本作「以知古始」，王弼、唐玄宗御注、蘇轍、吳澄、憨山、魏源本並作「能知古始」。正文從王弼本。", "source": "王弼《老子道德經注》、河上公《老子道德經章句》、唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》、蘇轍《老子解》、吳澄《道德真經注》、釋德清《道德經解》、魏源《老子本義》", "textSimp": "河上公本作「以知古始」，王弼、唐玄宗御注、苏辙、吴澄、憨山、魏源本并作「能知古始」。正文从王弼本。", "headwordSimp": "以知古始与能知古始", "sourceSimp": "王弼《老子道德经注》、河上公《老子道德经章句》、唐玄宗《道德真经注疏》、苏辙《老子解》、吴澄《道德真经注》、释德清《道德经解》、魏源《老子本义》", "id": "k007" }, { "sentenceId": "s002", "headword": "蘇轍復字", "text": "蘇轍本作「故復混而為一」，「故」下有「復」字；王弼、河上公、御注、成玄英、李榮、吳澄諸本無之。正文從王弼本。", "source": "蘇轍《老子解》、王弼《老子道德經注》、河上公《老子道德經章句》、唐玄宗《道德真經注疏》、成玄英《老子道德經義疏》、李榮《道德真經注》、吳澄《道德真經注》", "textSimp": "苏辙本作「故复混而为一」，「故」下有「复」字；王弼、河上公、御注、成玄英、李荣、吴澄诸本无之。正文从王弼本。", "headwordSimp": "苏辙复字", "sourceSimp": "苏辙《老子解》、王弼《老子道德经注》、河上公《老子道德经章句》、唐玄宗《道德真经注疏》、成玄英《老子道德经义疏》、李荣《道德真经注》、吴澄《道德真经注》", "id": "k008" }, { "sentenceId": "s004", "headword": "憨山衍為與昏其禮", "text": "憨山本「是谓为无状之状」衍「为」字，今刪；「其下幽暗不能以昏其礼」，「礼」疑當作「明」，今從文義作「明」。其本作「无象之象」，與王弼「無物之象」異。", "source": "釋德清《道德經解》", "textSimp": "憨山本「是谓为无状之状」衍「为」字，今删；「其下幽暗不能以昏其礼」，「礼」疑当作「明」，今从文义作「明」。其本作「无象之象」，与王弼「无物之象」异。", "headwordSimp": "憨山衍为与昏其礼", "sourceSimp": "释德清《道德经解》", "id": "k009" }, { "sentenceId": "s006", "headword": "魏源底本訛字", "text": "魏源底本「之不见其首」脫「迎」字，「御令之有」訛「今」為「令」，今從上下文校正；其校語謂「繩繩兮」王弼本無「兮」字，蘇轍本「故」下有「復」字、「物」作「象」，碑本無「是謂忽怳」四字。", "source": "魏源《老子本義》", "textSimp": "魏源底本「之不见其首」脱「迎」字，「御令之有」讹「今」为「令」，今从上下文校正；其校语谓「绳绳兮」王弼本无「兮」字，苏辙本「故」下有「复」字、「物」作「象」，碑本无「是谓忽怳」四字。", "headwordSimp": "魏源底本讹字", "sourceSimp": "魏源《老子本义》", "id": "k010" }, { "sentenceId": "s003", "headword": "嚴遵輯文", "text": "嚴遵道經原卷缺卷一至六，此章輯文三條，分別見於「繩繩不可名」「無狀之狀」「執古之道」下；底本「莫睹其無也」，「無」疑當作「有」或「形」，姑仍其舊，存疑待考。", "source": "《道德真經玄德纂疏》", "textSimp": "严遵道经原卷缺卷一至六，此章辑文三条，分别见于「绳绳不可名」「无状之状」「执古之道」下；底本「莫睹其无也」，「无」疑当作「有」或「形」，姑仍其旧，存疑待考。", "headwordSimp": "严遵辑文", "sourceSimp": "《道德真经玄德纂疏》", "id": "k011" }, { "sentenceId": "s006", "headword": "李榮異文", "text": "李榮專本「今道有為邪也」，《玄德纂疏》所引作「今道有為聖也」；「下從上以敬」，《玄德纂疏》所引作「下從上以除耶得道之綱要」。今從李榮專本，存其異文。", "source": "李榮《道德真經注》、《道德真經玄德纂疏》", "textSimp": "李荣专本「今道有为邪也」，《玄德纂疏》所引作「今道有为圣也」；「下从上以敬」，《玄德纂疏》所引作「下从上以除耶得道之纲要」。今从李荣专本，存其异文。", "headwordSimp": "李荣异文", "sourceSimp": "李荣《道德真经注》、《道德真经玄德纂疏》", "id": "k012" } ], "glossarySimp": { "夷": "无色之称；一说平易。", "希": "无声之称；一说希少、稀微。", "微": "无形之称；一说微妙、微茫。", "致诘": "穷究追问。致，得；诘，责问。", "混而为一": "混同为一体。", "皦": "明亮、光明。", "昧": "昏暗、暗昧。", "绳绳": "绵延不绝、运动无穷。", "无状之状": "没有形状的形状。", "无物之象": "没有物象的物象。", "惚恍": "若有若无、不可定名。", "道纪": "道的纲纪、统绪。" }, "lexicon": { "note": "由构建脚本从字词注与常用字表生成，供义位词典和开放数据集使用；occurrence 统计按繁体与简体正文分别匹配后合并。", "entries": [ { "order": 1, "id": "n001", "noteId": "n001", "sentenceId": "s001", "headword": "夷", "headwordSimp": "夷", "pinyin": "yí", "gloss": "平、平易；無色之稱。", "glossSimp": "平、平易；无色之称。", "general": "河上公注：「無色曰夷。」成玄英疏：「夷，平也。體非五色，不可以眼識求，故視之不見。」御注：「夷，平易也。道非色，故視不可見。」", "generalSimp": "河上公注：「无色曰夷。」成玄英疏：「夷，平也。体非五色，不可以眼识求，故视之不见。」御注：「夷，平易也。道非色，故视不可见。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "河上公注", "成玄英疏", "御注" ], "refsSimp": [ "河上公注", "成玄英疏", "御注" ], "forms": [ { "form": "夷", "formSimp": "夷", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s001" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s001" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 2, "id": "n002", "noteId": "n002", "sentenceId": "s001", "headword": "希", "headwordSimp": "希", "pinyin": "xī", "gloss": "希少、稀微；無聲之稱。", "glossSimp": "希少、稀微；无声之称。", "general": "河上公注：「無聲曰希。」成玄英疏：「希，簡少也。體非宮商，不可以耳根聽。」御注：「希者，聲之微也。」", "generalSimp": "河上公注：「无声曰希。」成玄英疏：「希，简少也。体非宫商，不可以耳根听。」御注：「希者，声之微也。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "河上公注", "成玄英疏", "御注" ], "refsSimp": [ "河上公注", "成玄英疏", "御注" ], "forms": [ { "form": "希", "formSimp": "希", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s001" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s001" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 3, "id": "n003", "noteId": "n003", "sentenceId": "s001", "headword": "搏", "headwordSimp": "搏", "pinyin": "bó", "gloss": "執持、觸摸。", "glossSimp": "执持、触摸。", "general": "御注：「搏，執持也。」成玄英疏：「搏，觸也。」李榮注：「大象無形，難可搏觸。」", "generalSimp": "御注：「搏，执持也。」成玄英疏：「搏，触也。」李荣注：「大象无形，难可搏触。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "御注", "成玄英疏", "李榮注" ], "refsSimp": [ "御注", "成玄英疏", "李荣注" ], "forms": [ { "form": "搏", "formSimp": "搏", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s001" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s001" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 4, "id": "n004", "noteId": "n004", "sentenceId": "s001", "headword": "微", "headwordSimp": "微", "pinyin": "wēi", "gloss": "微茫、微妙；無形之稱。", "glossSimp": "微茫、微妙；无形之称。", "general": "河上公注：「無形曰微。」御注：「微，妙色也。道無形，故執持不得。」成玄英疏：「微，妙也。言體非形質，不可搏觸而得。」", "generalSimp": "河上公注：「无形曰微。」御注：「微，妙色也。道无形，故执持不得。」成玄英疏：「微，妙也。言体非形质，不可搏触而得。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "河上公注", "御注", "成玄英疏" ], "refsSimp": [ "河上公注", "御注", "成玄英疏" ], "forms": [ { "form": "微", "formSimp": "微", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s001" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s001" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 5, "id": "n005", "noteId": "n005", "sentenceId": "s002", "headword": "致詰", "headwordSimp": "致诘", "pinyin": "zhì jié", "gloss": "窮究追問。致，得；詰，責問。", "glossSimp": "穷究追问。致，得；诘，责问。", "general": "御注：「三者將以詰道，道非聲色形法，故詰不可得。」御疏：「致，得也；詰，責也。」河上公注：「不可詰問而能得也。」", "generalSimp": "御注：「三者将以诘道，道非声色形法，故诘不可得。」御疏：「致，得也；诘，责也。」河上公注：「不可诘问而能得也。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "御注", "御疏", "河上公注" ], "refsSimp": [ "御注", "御疏", "河上公注" ], "forms": [ { "form": "致詰", "formSimp": "致诘", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s002" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s002" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 6, "id": "n006", "noteId": "n006", "sentenceId": "s002", "headword": "混而為一", "headwordSimp": "混而为一", "pinyin": "hùn ér wéi yī", "gloss": "混同為一體。混，合。", "glossSimp": "混同为一体。混，合。", "general": "河上公注：「混，合也。故三名合而為一。」成玄英疏：「散一以為三，混三以歸一。」吳澄注：「混同無所分別而名之為一。」", "generalSimp": "河上公注：「混，合也。故三名合而为一。」成玄英疏：「散一以为三，混三以归一。」吴澄注：「混同无所分别而名之为一。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "河上公注", "成玄英疏", "吳澄注" ], "refsSimp": [ "河上公注", "成玄英疏", "吴澄注" ], "forms": [ { "form": "混而為一", "formSimp": "混而为一", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s002" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s002" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 7, "id": "n007", "noteId": "n007", "sentenceId": "s003", "headword": "皦", "headwordSimp": "皦", "pinyin": "jiǎo", "gloss": "明亮、光明。", "glossSimp": "明亮、光明。", "general": "河上公注：「言一在天上，不皎皎光明。」御注：「皎，明也。」成玄英疏：「皎，明也；昧，闇也。」", "generalSimp": "河上公注：「言一在天上，不皎皎光明。」御注：「皎，明也。」成玄英疏：「皎，明也；昧，暗也。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "河上公注", "御注", "成玄英疏" ], "refsSimp": [ "河上公注", "御注", "成玄英疏" ], "forms": [ { "form": "皦", "formSimp": "皦", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s003" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s003" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 8, "id": "n008", "noteId": "n008", "sentenceId": "s003", "headword": "昧", "headwordSimp": "昧", "pinyin": "mèi", "gloss": "昏暗、暗昧。", "glossSimp": "昏暗、暗昧。", "general": "河上公注：「言一在天下，不昧昧有所暗冥。」御注：「昧，暗也。」御疏：「在上者則明，在下者則昧。」", "generalSimp": "河上公注：「言一在天下，不昧昧有所暗冥。」御注：「昧，暗也。」御疏：「在上者则明，在下者则昧。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "河上公注", "御注", "御疏" ], "refsSimp": [ "河上公注", "御注", "御疏" ], "forms": [ { "form": "昧", "formSimp": "昧", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s003" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s003" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 9, "id": "n009", "noteId": "n009", "sentenceId": "s003", "headword": "繩繩", "headwordSimp": "绳绳", "pinyin": "shéng shéng", "gloss": "綿延不絕、運動無窮。", "glossSimp": "绵延不绝、运动无穷。", "general": "河上公注：「繩繩者，動行無窮極也。」御注：「繩繩者，運動不絕之意。」蘇轍注：「繩繩，運而不絕也。」", "generalSimp": "河上公注：「绳绳者，动行无穷极也。」御注：「绳绳者，运动不绝之意。」苏辙注：「绳绳，运而不绝也。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "河上公注", "御注", "蘇轍注" ], "refsSimp": [ "河上公注", "御注", "苏辙注" ], "forms": [ { "form": "繩繩", "formSimp": "绳绳", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s003" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s003" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 10, "id": "n010", "noteId": "n010", "sentenceId": "s004", "headword": "惚恍", "headwordSimp": "惚恍", "pinyin": "hū huǎng", "gloss": "若有若無、不可定名。", "glossSimp": "若有若无、不可定名。", "general": "河上公注：「言一忽忽恍恍，若存若亡，不可得見。」御注：「不可名有，不可名無，無有難名，故謂之惚恍。」", "generalSimp": "河上公注：「言一忽忽恍恍，若存若亡，不可得见。」御注：「不可名有，不可名无，无有难名，故谓之惚恍。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "河上公注", "御注" ], "refsSimp": [ "河上公注", "御注" ], "forms": [ { "form": "惚恍", "formSimp": "惚恍", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s004" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s004" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 11, "id": "n011", "noteId": "n011", "sentenceId": "s005", "headword": "其首", "headwordSimp": "其首", "pinyin": "qí shǒu", "gloss": "它的開頭、前端。", "glossSimp": "它的开头、前端。", "general": "御注：「無始，故迎之不見其首。」成玄英疏：「迎不見其首，明道非古無始也。」", "generalSimp": "御注：「无始，故迎之不见其首。」成玄英疏：「迎不见其首，明道非古无始也。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "御注", "成玄英疏" ], "refsSimp": [ "御注", "成玄英疏" ], "forms": [ { "form": "其首", "formSimp": "其首", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s005" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s005" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 12, "id": "n012", "noteId": "n012", "sentenceId": "s005", "headword": "其後", "headwordSimp": "其后", "pinyin": "qí hòu", "gloss": "它的末尾、後端。", "glossSimp": "它的末尾、后端。", "general": "御注：「無終，故隨之不見其後。」成玄英疏：「隨不見其後，明道非今無終也。」", "generalSimp": "御注：「无终，故随之不见其后。」成玄英疏：「随不见其后，明道非今无终也。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "御注", "成玄英疏" ], "refsSimp": [ "御注", "成玄英疏" ], "forms": [ { "form": "其後", "formSimp": "其后", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s005" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s005" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 13, "id": "n013", "noteId": "n013", "sentenceId": "s006", "headword": "道紀", "headwordSimp": "道纪", "pinyin": "dào jì", "gloss": "道的綱紀、統緒。", "glossSimp": "道的纲纪、统绪。", "general": "御注：「能知古始所行，是謂道化之綱紀也。」吳澄注：「道紀者，德也。謂道散為德，如理絲之縷，有條而不紊也。」", "generalSimp": "御注：「能知古始所行，是谓道化之纲纪也。」吴澄注：「道纪者，德也。谓道散为德，如理丝之缕，有条而不紊也。」", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [ "御注", "吳澄注" ], "refsSimp": [ "御注", "吴澄注" ], "forms": [ { "form": "道紀", "formSimp": "道纪", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s006" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s006" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 } ], "glossaryEntries": [ { "order": 14, "id": "g001", "noteId": "", "sentenceId": "s001", "headword": "夷", "headwordSimp": "夷", "pinyin": "", "gloss": "無色之稱；一說平易。", "glossSimp": "无色之称；一说平易。", "general": "", "generalSimp": "", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [], "refsSimp": [], "forms": [ { "form": "夷", "formSimp": "夷", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s001" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s001" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 15, "id": "g002", "noteId": "", "sentenceId": "s001", "headword": "希", "headwordSimp": "希", "pinyin": "", "gloss": "無聲之稱；一說希少、稀微。", "glossSimp": "无声之称；一说希少、稀微。", "general": "", "generalSimp": "", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [], "refsSimp": [], "forms": [ { "form": "希", "formSimp": "希", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s001" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s001" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 16, "id": "g003", "noteId": "", "sentenceId": "s001", "headword": "微", "headwordSimp": "微", "pinyin": "", "gloss": "無形之稱；一說微妙、微茫。", "glossSimp": "无形之称；一说微妙、微茫。", "general": "", "generalSimp": "", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [], "refsSimp": [], "forms": [ { "form": "微", "formSimp": "微", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s001" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s001" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 17, "id": "g004", "noteId": "", "sentenceId": "s002", "headword": "致詰", "headwordSimp": "致诘", "pinyin": "", "gloss": "窮究追問。致，得；詰，責問。", "glossSimp": "穷究追问。致，得；诘，责问。", "general": "", "generalSimp": "", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [], "refsSimp": [], "forms": [ { "form": "致詰", "formSimp": "致诘", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s002" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s002" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 18, "id": "g005", "noteId": "", "sentenceId": "s002", "headword": "混而為一", "headwordSimp": "混而为一", "pinyin": "", "gloss": "混同為一體。", "glossSimp": "混同为一体。", "general": "", "generalSimp": "", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [], "refsSimp": [], "forms": [ { "form": "混而為一", "formSimp": "混而为一", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s002" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s002" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 19, "id": "g006", "noteId": "", "sentenceId": "s003", "headword": "皦", "headwordSimp": "皦", "pinyin": "", "gloss": "明亮、光明。", "glossSimp": "明亮、光明。", "general": "", "generalSimp": "", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [], "refsSimp": [], "forms": [ { "form": "皦", "formSimp": "皦", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s003" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s003" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 20, "id": "g007", "noteId": "", "sentenceId": "s003", "headword": "昧", "headwordSimp": "昧", "pinyin": "", "gloss": "昏暗、暗昧。", "glossSimp": "昏暗、暗昧。", "general": "", "generalSimp": "", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [], "refsSimp": [], "forms": [ { "form": "昧", "formSimp": "昧", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s003" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s003" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 21, "id": "g008", "noteId": "", "sentenceId": "s003", "headword": "繩繩", "headwordSimp": "绳绳", "pinyin": "", "gloss": "綿延不絕、運動無窮。", "glossSimp": "绵延不绝、运动无穷。", "general": "", "generalSimp": "", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [], "refsSimp": [], "forms": [ { "form": "繩繩", "formSimp": "绳绳", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s003" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s003" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 22, "id": "g009", "noteId": "", "sentenceId": "s004", "headword": "無狀之狀", "headwordSimp": "无状之状", "pinyin": "", "gloss": "沒有形狀的形狀。", "glossSimp": "没有形状的形状。", "general": "", "generalSimp": "", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [], "refsSimp": [], "forms": [ { "form": "無狀之狀", "formSimp": "无状之状", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s004" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s004" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 23, "id": "g010", "noteId": "", "sentenceId": "s004", "headword": "無物之象", "headwordSimp": "无物之象", "pinyin": "", "gloss": "沒有物象的物象。", "glossSimp": "没有物象的物象。", "general": "", "generalSimp": "", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [], "refsSimp": [], "forms": [ { "form": "無物之象", "formSimp": "无物之象", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s004" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s004" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 24, "id": "g011", "noteId": "", "sentenceId": "s004", "headword": "惚恍", "headwordSimp": "惚恍", "pinyin": "", "gloss": "若有若無、不可定名。", "glossSimp": "若有若无、不可定名。", "general": "", "generalSimp": "", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [], "refsSimp": [], "forms": [ { "form": "惚恍", "formSimp": "惚恍", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s004" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s004" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 }, { "order": 25, "id": "g012", "noteId": "", "sentenceId": "s006", "headword": "道紀", "headwordSimp": "道纪", "pinyin": "", "gloss": "道的綱紀、統緒。", "glossSimp": "道的纲纪、统绪。", "general": "", "generalSimp": "", "variants": [], "variantsSimp": [], "refs": [], "refsSimp": [], "forms": [ { "form": "道紀", "formSimp": "道纪", "kind": "headword", "count": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s006" ] } ], "occurrenceSentenceIds": [ "s006" ], "occurrenceCount": 1 } ] }, "relations": { "version": "1.0.0", "note": "第十四章六組觀念的十二至十三家對照。嚴遵道經原卷缺卷一至六，此章僅存「繩繩不可名」「無狀之狀」「執古之道」下三條輯文，故僅見於無狀、執古二組；王弼以三段注通釋全章，故夷、希、微、混一一組用其首注，無狀一組用其中注，執古一組用其末注。河上公、成玄英、唐玄宗、李榮、陸希聲、呂惠卿、蘇轍、吳澄、憨山、魏源、王夫之十一家六組皆備。", "concepts": [ { "id": "shi-zhi-bujian-yi", "name": "視之不見名曰夷", "nameTrad": "視之不見名曰夷", "question": "「視之不見」何以名之曰「夷」？「夷」何以兼平易與無色二義？", "questionTrad": "「視之不見」何以名之曰「夷」？「夷」何以兼平易與無色二義？", "intro": "首句以「夷」標無色之名。河上公謂無色曰夷，一無彩色故不可得視；成玄英以平釋夷，謂體非五色、不可以眼識求，只為無色故夷然平等；唐玄宗御注以平易釋夷，謂道非色而於無色之中能色，御疏以無色之中能應眾色申之；李榮謂眼所不見而聖人獨見曉，大道甚夷、坦然善謀；陸希聲謂道非色聲形，不可以耳目手足得，強名之曰希夷微；呂惠卿謂視者無有，雖不見而能玄能黃，不可名以無色；蘇轍謂所以見色者不可見；吳澄謂平夷則泯沒無跡，故視之不見；憨山謂夷為無色，故視不可見；魏源校本章異文而引吳澄、呂惠卿；王夫之謂物有間而人不知，道無間而人強分，以無間乘有間則患與名去；王弼以無狀無象、無聲無響、無所不通為說。", "introTrad": "首句以「夷」標無色之名。河上公謂無色曰夷，一無彩色故不可得視；成玄英以平釋夷，謂體非五色、不可以眼識求，只為無色故夷然平等；唐玄宗御注以平易釋夷，謂道非色而於無色之中能色，御疏以無色之中能應眾色申之；李榮謂眼所不見而聖人獨見曉，大道甚夷、坦然善謀；陸希聲謂道非色聲形，不可以耳目手足得，強名之曰希夷微；呂惠卿謂視者無有，雖不見而能玄能黃，不可名以無色；蘇轍謂所以見色者不可見；吳澄謂平夷則泯沒無跡，故視之不見；憨山謂夷為無色，故視不可見；魏源校本章異文而引吳澄、呂惠卿；王夫之謂物有間而人不知，道無間而人強分，以無間乘有間則患與名去；王弼以無狀無象、無聲無響、無所不通為說。", "positions": { "heshanggong": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "無色曰夷；一無彩色，不可得而視之。", "thesisTrad": "無色曰夷；一無彩色，不可得而視之。", "noteIds": [ "c001" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "无色曰夷；一无彩色，不可得而视之。" }, "wangbi": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "無狀無象，無聲無響，故無所不通；以耳目體不知為名，故不可致詰。", "thesisTrad": "無狀無象，無聲無響，故無所不通；以耳目體不知為名，故不可致詰。", "noteIds": [ "c007" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "无状无象，无声无响，故无所不通；以耳目体不知为名，故不可致诘。" }, "chengxuanying": { "workType": "疏", "workTypeTrad": "疏", "thesis": "夷，平也；體非五色，不可以眼識求；只為無色，故夷然平等。", "thesisTrad": "夷，平也；體非五色，不可以眼識求；只為無色，故夷然平等。", "noteIds": [ "c010" ], "workTypeSimp": "疏", "thesisSimp": "夷，平也；体非五色，不可以眼识求；只为无色，故夷然平等。" }, "tangxuanzong": { "workType": "御注", "workTypeTrad": "御注", "thesis": "夷，平易也；道非色故視不可見，於無色之中而能色，故名夷。", "thesisTrad": "夷，平易也；道非色故視不可見，於無色之中而能色，故名夷。", "noteIds": [ "c016", "c022" ], "workTypeSimp": "御注", "thesisSimp": "夷，平易也；道非色故视不可见，于无色之中而能色，故名夷。" }, "lirong": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "眼所不見，聖人體之獨見曉；夷，平也，大道甚夷。", "thesisTrad": "眼所不見，聖人體之獨見曉；夷，平也，大道甚夷。", "noteIds": [ "c031" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "眼所不见，圣人体之独见晓；夷，平也，大道甚夷。" }, "luxisheng": { "workType": "傳", "workTypeTrad": "傳", "thesis": "道非色聲形，不可以耳目手足得，強名之曰希夷微。", "thesisTrad": "道非色聲形，不可以耳目手足得，強名之曰希夷微。", "noteIds": [ "c037" ], "workTypeSimp": "传", "thesisSimp": "道非色声形，不可以耳目手足得，强名之曰希夷微。" }, "lvhuiqing": { "workType": "傳", "workTypeTrad": "傳", "thesis": "視者無有，故視之不見；雖不見而能玄能黃，不可名以無色，曰夷。", "thesisTrad": "視者無有，故視之不見；雖不見而能玄能黃，不可名以無色，曰夷。", "noteIds": [ "c038" ], "workTypeSimp": "传", "thesisSimp": "视者无有，故视之不见；虽不见而能玄能黄，不可名以无色，曰夷。" }, "suzhe": { "workType": "解", "workTypeTrad": "解", "thesis": "視之而見者色，所以見色者不可見。", "thesisTrad": "視之而見者色，所以見色者不可見。", "noteIds": [ "c039" ], "workTypeSimp": "解", "thesisSimp": "视之而见者色，所以见色者不可见。" }, "wucheng": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "夷謂平夷，泯沒無跡，故視之不見。", "thesisTrad": "夷謂平夷，泯沒無跡，故視之不見。", "noteIds": [ "c044" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "夷谓平夷，泯没无迹，故视之不见。" }, "hanshan": { "workType": "解", "workTypeTrad": "解", "thesis": "夷，無色也，故視之不可見。", "thesisTrad": "夷，無色也，故視之不可見。", "noteIds": [ "c047" ], "workTypeSimp": "解", "thesisSimp": "夷，无色也，故视之不可见。" }, "weiyuan": { "workType": "本義", "workTypeTrad": "本義", "thesis": "本章多校文字異同，引吳澄、呂惠卿為說；夷希微與一皆指常德。", "thesisTrad": "本章多校文字異同，引吳澄、呂惠卿為說；夷希微與一皆指常德。", "noteIds": [ "c048" ], "workTypeSimp": "本义", "thesisSimp": "本章多校文字异同，引吴澄、吕惠卿为说；夷希微与一皆指常德。" }, "wangfuzhi": { "workType": "衍", "workTypeTrad": "衍", "thesis": "物有間而人不知，道無間而人強分；以無間乘有間，則患與名去。", "thesisTrad": "物有間而人不知，道無間而人強分；以無間乘有間，則患與名去。", "noteIds": [ "c049" ], "workTypeSimp": "衍", "thesisSimp": "物有间而人不知，道无间而人强分；以无间乘有间，则患与名去。" } }, "chain": [ { "noteId": "c001", "relation": "立論", "relationTrad": "立論", "text": "河上公以無色曰夷，一無彩色故不可得視。", "textTrad": "河上公以無色曰夷，一無彩色故不可得視。", "relationSimp": "立论", "textSimp": "河上公以无色曰夷，一无彩色故不可得视。" }, { "noteId": "c007", "relation": "注", "relationTrad": "注", "text": "王弼以無狀無象、無聲無響，故無所不通。", "textTrad": "王弼以無狀無象、無聲無響，故無所不通。", "relationSimp": "注", "textSimp": "王弼以无状无象、无声无响，故无所不通。" }, { "noteId": "c010", "relation": "疏", "relationTrad": "疏", "text": "成玄英以夷為平，體非五色故夷然平等。", "textTrad": "成玄英以夷為平，體非五色故夷然平等。", "relationSimp": "疏", "textSimp": "成玄英以夷为平，体非五色故夷然平等。" }, { "noteId": "c016", "relation": "御注", "relationTrad": "御注", "text": "唐玄宗御注以夷為平易，無色之中而能色。", "textTrad": "唐玄宗御注以夷為平易，無色之中而能色。", "relationSimp": "御注", "textSimp": "唐玄宗御注以夷为平易，无色之中而能色。" }, { "noteId": "c031", "relation": "注", "relationTrad": "注", "text": "李榮以眼所不見而聖人獨見曉，大道甚夷。", "textTrad": "李榮以眼所不見而聖人獨見曉，大道甚夷。", "relationSimp": "注", "textSimp": "李荣以眼所不见而圣人独见晓，大道甚夷。" }, { "noteId": "c037", "relation": "傳", "relationTrad": "傳", "text": "陸希聲以道非色聲形，強名之曰希夷微。", "textTrad": "陸希聲以道非色聲形，強名之曰希夷微。", "relationSimp": "传", "textSimp": "陆希声以道非色声形，强名之曰希夷微。" }, { "noteId": "c038", "relation": "傳", "relationTrad": "傳", "text": "呂惠卿以視者無有，雖不見而能玄能黃。", "textTrad": "呂惠卿以視者無有，雖不見而能玄能黃。", "relationSimp": "传", "textSimp": "吕惠卿以视者无有，虽不见而能玄能黄。" }, { "noteId": "c039", "relation": "解", "relationTrad": "解", "text": "蘇轍以所以見色者不可見。", "textTrad": "蘇轍以所以見色者不可見。", "relationSimp": "解", "textSimp": "苏辙以所以见色者不可见。" }, { "noteId": "c044", "relation": "注", "relationTrad": "注", "text": "吳澄以平夷泯沒無跡，故視之不見。", "textTrad": "吳澄以平夷泯沒無跡，故視之不見。", "relationSimp": "注", "textSimp": "吴澄以平夷泯没无迹，故视之不见。" }, { "noteId": "c047", "relation": "解", "relationTrad": "解", "text": "憨山以夷為無色，故視之不可見。", "textTrad": "憨山以夷為無色，故視之不可見。", "relationSimp": "解", "textSimp": "憨山以夷为无色，故视之不可见。" }, { "noteId": "c048", "relation": "本義", "relationTrad": "本義", "text": "魏源校本章異文，引吳澄、呂惠卿為說。", "textTrad": "魏源校本章異文，引吳澄、呂惠卿為說。", "relationSimp": "本义", "textSimp": "魏源校本章异文，引吴澄、吕惠卿为说。" }, { "noteId": "c049", "relation": "衍", "relationTrad": "衍", "text": "王夫之以無間乘有間，則患與名去。", "textTrad": "王夫之以無間乘有間，則患與名去。", "relationSimp": "衍", "textSimp": "王夫之以无间乘有间，则患与名去。" } ], "nameSimp": "视之不见名曰夷", "questionSimp": "「视之不见」何以名之曰「夷」？「夷」何以兼平易与无色二义？", "introSimp": "首句以「夷」标无色之名。河上公谓无色曰夷，一无彩色故不可得视；成玄英以平释夷，谓体非五色、不可以眼识求，只为无色故夷然平等；唐玄宗御注以平易释夷，谓道非色而于无色之中能色，御疏以无色之中能应众色申之；李荣谓眼所不见而圣人独见晓，大道甚夷、坦然善谋；陆希声谓道非色声形，不可以耳目手足得，强名之曰希夷微；吕惠卿谓视者无有，虽不见而能玄能黄，不可名以无色；苏辙谓所以见色者不可见；吴澄谓平夷则泯没无迹，故视之不见；憨山谓夷为无色，故视不可见；魏源校本章异文而引吴澄、吕惠卿；王夫之谓物有间而人不知，道无间而人强分，以无间乘有间则患与名去；王弼以无状无象、无声无响、无所不通为说。" }, { "id": "ting-zhi-buwen-xi", "name": "聽之不聞名曰希", "nameTrad": "聽之不聞名曰希", "question": "「聽之不聞」何以名之曰「希」？「希」何以兼希少與無聲二義？", "questionTrad": "「聽之不聞」何以名之曰「希」？「希」何以兼希少與無聲二義？", "intro": "次句以「希」標無聲之名。河上公謂無聲曰希，一無音聲故不得聽聞；成玄英以簡少釋希，謂體非宮商、不可以耳根聽；唐玄宗御注以聲之微釋希，謂道非聲而於無聲之中獨能和，故名希，御疏以無聲之中能和眾聲申之；李榮引大音希聲，謂耳所不聞而聖人獨聞和，玄教難遇、希言自然；陸希聲謂道非色聲形而強名希夷微；呂惠卿謂聽者無有，雖不聞而能宮能商，不可名以無聲；蘇轍謂所以聞聲者不可聞；吳澄謂希疏則間闊無聲，故聽之不聞；憨山謂希為無聲，故聽不可聞；魏源校異文而引二家；王夫之謂道無間而人強分，執之別之而道僅為名；王弼以無聲無響、無所不通為說。", "introTrad": "次句以「希」標無聲之名。河上公謂無聲曰希，一無音聲故不得聽聞；成玄英以簡少釋希，謂體非宮商、不可以耳根聽；唐玄宗御注以聲之微釋希，謂道非聲而於無聲之中獨能和，故名希，御疏以無聲之中能和眾聲申之；李榮引大音希聲，謂耳所不聞而聖人獨聞和，玄教難遇、希言自然；陸希聲謂道非色聲形而強名希夷微；呂惠卿謂聽者無有，雖不聞而能宮能商，不可名以無聲；蘇轍謂所以聞聲者不可聞；吳澄謂希疏則間闊無聲，故聽之不聞；憨山謂希為無聲，故聽不可聞；魏源校異文而引二家；王夫之謂道無間而人強分，執之別之而道僅為名；王弼以無聲無響、無所不通為說。", "positions": { "heshanggong": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "無聲曰希；一無音聲，不得聽而聞之。", "thesisTrad": "無聲曰希；一無音聲，不得聽而聞之。", "noteIds": [ "c001" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "无声曰希；一无音声，不得听而闻之。" }, "wangbi": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "無聲無響，故無所不通；更以耳目體不知為名。", "thesisTrad": "無聲無響，故無所不通；更以耳目體不知為名。", "noteIds": [ "c007" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "无声无响，故无所不通；更以耳目体不知为名。" }, "chengxuanying": { "workType": "疏", "workTypeTrad": "疏", "thesis": "希，簡少也；體非宮商，不可以耳根聽，故曰希。", "thesisTrad": "希，簡少也；體非宮商，不可以耳根聽，故曰希。", "noteIds": [ "c010" ], "workTypeSimp": "疏", "thesisSimp": "希，简少也；体非宫商，不可以耳根听，故曰希。" }, "tangxuanzong": { "workType": "御注", "workTypeTrad": "御注", "thesis": "希者，聲之微也；道非聲故聽不聞，於無聲之中獨能和，故名希。", "thesisTrad": "希者，聲之微也；道非聲故聽不聞，於無聲之中獨能和，故名希。", "noteIds": [ "c016", "c022" ], "workTypeSimp": "御注", "thesisSimp": "希者，声之微也；道非声故听不闻，于无声之中独能和，故名希。" }, "lirong": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "大音希聲，耳所不聞，聖人洞之獨聞和；玄教難遇，希言自然。", "thesisTrad": "大音希聲，耳所不聞，聖人洞之獨聞和；玄教難遇，希言自然。", "noteIds": [ "c031" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "大音希声，耳所不闻，圣人洞之独闻和；玄教难遇，希言自然。" }, "luxisheng": { "workType": "傳", "workTypeTrad": "傳", "thesis": "道非色聲形，不可以耳目手足得，強名之曰希夷微。", "thesisTrad": "道非色聲形，不可以耳目手足得，強名之曰希夷微。", "noteIds": [ "c037" ], "workTypeSimp": "传", "thesisSimp": "道非色声形，不可以耳目手足得，强名之曰希夷微。" }, "lvhuiqing": { "workType": "傳", "workTypeTrad": "傳", "thesis": "聽者無有，故聽之不聞；雖不聞而能宮能商，不可名以無聲，曰希。", "thesisTrad": "聽者無有，故聽之不聞；雖不聞而能宮能商，不可名以無聲，曰希。", "noteIds": [ "c038" ], "workTypeSimp": "传", "thesisSimp": "听者无有，故听之不闻；虽不闻而能宫能商，不可名以无声，曰希。" }, "suzhe": { "workType": "解", "workTypeTrad": "解", "thesis": "聽之而聞者聲，所以聞聲者不可聞。", "thesisTrad": "聽之而聞者聲，所以聞聲者不可聞。", "noteIds": [ "c039" ], "workTypeSimp": "解", "thesisSimp": "听之而闻者声，所以闻声者不可闻。" }, "wucheng": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "希謂希疏，間闊無聲，故聽之不聞。", "thesisTrad": "希謂希疏，間闊無聲，故聽之不聞。", "noteIds": [ "c044" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "希谓希疏，间阔无声，故听之不闻。" }, "hanshan": { "workType": "解", "workTypeTrad": "解", "thesis": "希，無聲也，故聽之不可聞。", "thesisTrad": "希，無聲也，故聽之不可聞。", "noteIds": [ "c047" ], "workTypeSimp": "解", "thesisSimp": "希，无声也，故听之不可闻。" }, "weiyuan": { "workType": "本義", "workTypeTrad": "本義", "thesis": "本章多校文字異同，引吳澄、呂惠卿為說；夷希微與一皆指常德。", "thesisTrad": "本章多校文字異同，引吳澄、呂惠卿為說；夷希微與一皆指常德。", "noteIds": [ "c048" ], "workTypeSimp": "本义", "thesisSimp": "本章多校文字异同，引吴澄、吕惠卿为说；夷希微与一皆指常德。" }, "wangfuzhi": { "workType": "衍", "workTypeTrad": "衍", "thesis": "道無間而人強分，故執之別之而道僅為名。", "thesisTrad": "道無間而人強分，故執之別之而道僅為名。", "noteIds": [ "c049" ], "workTypeSimp": "衍", "thesisSimp": "道无间而人强分，故执之别之而道仅为名。" } }, "chain": [ { "noteId": "c001", "relation": "立論", "relationTrad": "立論", "text": "河上公以無聲曰希，一無音聲故不得聽聞。", "textTrad": "河上公以無聲曰希，一無音聲故不得聽聞。", "relationSimp": "立论", "textSimp": "河上公以无声曰希，一无音声故不得听闻。" }, { "noteId": "c007", "relation": "注", "relationTrad": "注", "text": "王弼以無聲無響，故無所不通。", "textTrad": "王弼以無聲無響，故無所不通。", "relationSimp": "注", "textSimp": "王弼以无声无响，故无所不通。" }, { "noteId": "c010", "relation": "疏", "relationTrad": "疏", "text": "成玄英以希為簡少，體非宮商故不可以耳根聽。", "textTrad": "成玄英以希為簡少，體非宮商故不可以耳根聽。", "relationSimp": "疏", "textSimp": "成玄英以希为简少，体非宫商故不可以耳根听。" }, { "noteId": "c016", "relation": "御注", "relationTrad": "御注", "text": "唐玄宗御注以希為聲之微，無聲之中獨能和。", "textTrad": "唐玄宗御注以希為聲之微，無聲之中獨能和。", "relationSimp": "御注", "textSimp": "唐玄宗御注以希为声之微，无声之中独能和。" }, { "noteId": "c031", "relation": "注", "relationTrad": "注", "text": "李榮以大音希聲，聖人獨聞和，希言自然。", "textTrad": "李榮以大音希聲，聖人獨聞和，希言自然。", "relationSimp": "注", "textSimp": "李荣以大音希声，圣人独闻和，希言自然。" }, { "noteId": "c037", "relation": "傳", "relationTrad": "傳", "text": "陸希聲以道非色聲形，強名之曰希夷微。", "textTrad": "陸希聲以道非色聲形，強名之曰希夷微。", "relationSimp": "传", "textSimp": "陆希声以道非色声形，强名之曰希夷微。" }, { "noteId": "c038", "relation": "傳", "relationTrad": "傳", "text": "呂惠卿以聽者無有，雖不聞而能宮能商。", "textTrad": "呂惠卿以聽者無有，雖不聞而能宮能商。", "relationSimp": "传", "textSimp": "吕惠卿以听者无有，虽不闻而能宫能商。" }, { "noteId": "c039", "relation": "解", "relationTrad": "解", "text": "蘇轍以所以聞聲者不可聞。", "textTrad": "蘇轍以所以聞聲者不可聞。", "relationSimp": "解", "textSimp": "苏辙以所以闻声者不可闻。" }, { "noteId": "c044", "relation": "注", "relationTrad": "注", "text": "吳澄以希疏間闊無聲，故聽之不聞。", "textTrad": "吳澄以希疏間闊無聲，故聽之不聞。", "relationSimp": "注", "textSimp": "吴澄以希疏间阔无声，故听之不闻。" }, { "noteId": "c047", "relation": "解", "relationTrad": "解", "text": "憨山以希為無聲，故聽之不可聞。", "textTrad": "憨山以希為無聲，故聽之不可聞。", "relationSimp": "解", "textSimp": "憨山以希为无声，故听之不可闻。" }, { "noteId": "c048", "relation": "本義", "relationTrad": "本義", "text": "魏源校本章異文，引吳澄、呂惠卿為說。", "textTrad": "魏源校本章異文，引吳澄、呂惠卿為說。", "relationSimp": "本义", "textSimp": "魏源校本章异文，引吴澄、吕惠卿为说。" }, { "noteId": "c049", "relation": "衍", "relationTrad": "衍", "text": "王夫之謂道無間而人強分，道僅為名。", "textTrad": "王夫之謂道無間而人強分，道僅為名。", "relationSimp": "衍", "textSimp": "王夫之谓道无间而人强分，道仅为名。" } ], "nameSimp": "听之不闻名曰希", "questionSimp": "「听之不闻」何以名之曰「希」？「希」何以兼希少与无声二义？", "introSimp": "次句以「希」标无声之名。河上公谓无声曰希，一无音声故不得听闻；成玄英以简少释希，谓体非宫商、不可以耳根听；唐玄宗御注以声之微释希，谓道非声而于无声之中独能和，故名希，御疏以无声之中能和众声申之；李荣引大音希声，谓耳所不闻而圣人独闻和，玄教难遇、希言自然；陆希声谓道非色声形而强名希夷微；吕惠卿谓听者无有，虽不闻而能宫能商，不可名以无声；苏辙谓所以闻声者不可闻；吴澄谓希疏则间阔无声，故听之不闻；憨山谓希为无声，故听不可闻；魏源校异文而引二家；王夫之谓道无间而人强分，执之别之而道仅为名；王弼以无声无响、无所不通为说。" }, { "id": "bo-zhi-bude-wei", "name": "搏之不得名曰微", "nameTrad": "搏之不得名曰微", "question": "「搏之不得」何以名之曰「微」？「微」何以兼微妙與無形二義？", "questionTrad": "「搏之不得」何以名之曰「微」？「微」何以兼微妙與無形二義？", "intro": "第三句以「微」標無形之名。河上公謂無形曰微，一無體故不可搏持而得；成玄英以妙釋微，謂體非形質、不可搏觸而得；唐玄宗御注以妙色釋微，謂道無形而於無形之中能形，故名微，御疏以無形之中能狀眾形申之；李榮謂大象無形、難可搏觸，微者機也、無也，動而應物；陸希聲謂道非色聲形而強名希夷微；呂惠卿謂搏者無有，雖不得而能陰能陽、能短能長，不可名以無形；蘇轍謂所以得觸者不可得；吳澄謂微茫則杳漠無形，故搏之不得；憨山謂微為無相，故搏不可得；魏源校異文而引二家；王夫之謂道無間而人強分，以無間乘有間則患與名去；王弼以無狀無象、不得而知為說。", "introTrad": "第三句以「微」標無形之名。河上公謂無形曰微，一無體故不可搏持而得；成玄英以妙釋微，謂體非形質、不可搏觸而得；唐玄宗御注以妙色釋微，謂道無形而於無形之中能形，故名微，御疏以無形之中能狀眾形申之；李榮謂大象無形、難可搏觸，微者機也、無也，動而應物；陸希聲謂道非色聲形而強名希夷微；呂惠卿謂搏者無有，雖不得而能陰能陽、能短能長，不可名以無形；蘇轍謂所以得觸者不可得；吳澄謂微茫則杳漠無形，故搏之不得；憨山謂微為無相，故搏不可得；魏源校異文而引二家；王夫之謂道無間而人強分，以無間乘有間則患與名去；王弼以無狀無象、不得而知為說。", "positions": { "heshanggong": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "無形曰微；一無體，不可搏持而得之。", "thesisTrad": "無形曰微；一無體，不可搏持而得之。", "noteIds": [ "c001" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "无形曰微；一无体，不可搏持而得之。" }, "wangbi": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "無狀無象，無聲無響，不得而知，故不可致詰。", "thesisTrad": "無狀無象，無聲無響，不得而知，故不可致詰。", "noteIds": [ "c007" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "无状无象，无声无响，不得而知，故不可致诘。" }, "chengxuanying": { "workType": "疏", "workTypeTrad": "疏", "thesis": "微，妙也；體非形質，不可搏觸而得。", "thesisTrad": "微，妙也；體非形質，不可搏觸而得。", "noteIds": [ "c010" ], "workTypeSimp": "疏", "thesisSimp": "微，妙也；体非形质，不可搏触而得。" }, "tangxuanzong": { "workType": "御注", "workTypeTrad": "御注", "thesis": "微，妙色也；道無形故執持不得，於無形之中而能形，故名微。", "thesisTrad": "微，妙色也；道無形故執持不得，於無形之中而能形，故名微。", "noteIds": [ "c016", "c022" ], "workTypeSimp": "御注", "thesisSimp": "微，妙色也；道无形故执持不得，于无形之中而能形，故名微。" }, "lirong": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "大象無形，難可搏觸；微者機也，無也，動而應物。", "thesisTrad": "大象無形，難可搏觸；微者機也，無也，動而應物。", "noteIds": [ "c031" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "大象无形，难可搏触；微者机也，无也，动而应物。" }, "luxisheng": { "workType": "傳", "workTypeTrad": "傳", "thesis": "道非色聲形，不可以耳目手足得，強名之曰希夷微。", "thesisTrad": "道非色聲形，不可以耳目手足得，強名之曰希夷微。", "noteIds": [ "c037" ], "workTypeSimp": "传", "thesisSimp": "道非色声形，不可以耳目手足得，强名之曰希夷微。" }, "lvhuiqing": { "workType": "傳", "workTypeTrad": "傳", "thesis": "搏者無有，故搏之不得；雖不得而能陰能陽、能短能長，不可名以無形，曰微。", "thesisTrad": "搏者無有，故搏之不得；雖不得而能陰能陽、能短能長，不可名以無形，曰微。", "noteIds": [ "c038" ], "workTypeSimp": "传", "thesisSimp": "搏者无有，故搏之不得；虽不得而能阴能阳、能短能长，不可名以无形，曰微。" }, "suzhe": { "workType": "解", "workTypeTrad": "解", "thesis": "搏之而得者觸，所以得觸者不可得。", "thesisTrad": "搏之而得者觸，所以得觸者不可得。", "noteIds": [ "c039" ], "workTypeSimp": "解", "thesisSimp": "搏之而得者触，所以得触者不可得。" }, "wucheng": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "微謂微茫，杳漠無形，故搏之不得。", "thesisTrad": "微謂微茫，杳漠無形，故搏之不得。", "noteIds": [ "c044" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "微谓微茫，杳漠无形，故搏之不得。" }, "hanshan": { "workType": "解", "workTypeTrad": "解", "thesis": "微，無相也，故搏之不可得。", "thesisTrad": "微，無相也，故搏之不可得。", "noteIds": [ "c047" ], "workTypeSimp": "解", "thesisSimp": "微，无相也，故搏之不可得。" }, "weiyuan": { "workType": "本義", "workTypeTrad": "本義", "thesis": "本章多校文字異同，引吳澄、呂惠卿為說；夷希微與一皆指常德。", "thesisTrad": "本章多校文字異同，引吳澄、呂惠卿為說；夷希微與一皆指常德。", "noteIds": [ "c048" ], "workTypeSimp": "本义", "thesisSimp": "本章多校文字异同，引吴澄、吕惠卿为说；夷希微与一皆指常德。" }, "wangfuzhi": { "workType": "衍", "workTypeTrad": "衍", "thesis": "物有間而人不知，道無間而人強分；以無間乘有間，則患與名去。", "thesisTrad": "物有間而人不知，道無間而人強分；以無間乘有間，則患與名去。", "noteIds": [ "c049" ], "workTypeSimp": "衍", "thesisSimp": "物有间而人不知，道无间而人强分；以无间乘有间，则患与名去。" } }, "chain": [ { "noteId": "c001", "relation": "立論", "relationTrad": "立論", "text": "河上公以無形曰微，一無體故不可搏持。", "textTrad": "河上公以無形曰微，一無體故不可搏持。", "relationSimp": "立论", "textSimp": "河上公以无形曰微，一无体故不可搏持。" }, { "noteId": "c007", "relation": "注", "relationTrad": "注", "text": "王弼以無狀無象、不得而知為說。", "textTrad": "王弼以無狀無象、不得而知為說。", "relationSimp": "注", "textSimp": "王弼以无状无象、不得而知为说。" }, { "noteId": "c010", "relation": "疏", "relationTrad": "疏", "text": "成玄英以微為妙，體非形質故不可搏觸。", "textTrad": "成玄英以微為妙，體非形質故不可搏觸。", "relationSimp": "疏", "textSimp": "成玄英以微为妙，体非形质故不可搏触。" }, { "noteId": "c016", "relation": "御注", "relationTrad": "御注", "text": "唐玄宗御注以微為妙色，無形之中而能形。", "textTrad": "唐玄宗御注以微為妙色，無形之中而能形。", "relationSimp": "御注", "textSimp": "唐玄宗御注以微为妙色，无形之中而能形。" }, { "noteId": "c031", "relation": "注", "relationTrad": "注", "text": "李榮以大象無形、難可搏觸，微者機也。", "textTrad": "李榮以大象無形、難可搏觸，微者機也。", "relationSimp": "注", "textSimp": "李荣以大象无形、难可搏触，微者机也。" }, { "noteId": "c037", "relation": "傳", "relationTrad": "傳", "text": "陸希聲以道非色聲形，強名之曰希夷微。", "textTrad": "陸希聲以道非色聲形，強名之曰希夷微。", "relationSimp": "传", "textSimp": "陆希声以道非色声形，强名之曰希夷微。" }, { "noteId": "c038", "relation": "傳", "relationTrad": "傳", "text": "呂惠卿以搏者無有，雖不得而能陰能陽。", "textTrad": "呂惠卿以搏者無有，雖不得而能陰能陽。", "relationSimp": "传", "textSimp": "吕惠卿以搏者无有，虽不得而能阴能阳。" }, { "noteId": "c039", "relation": "解", "relationTrad": "解", "text": "蘇轍以所以得觸者不可得。", "textTrad": "蘇轍以所以得觸者不可得。", "relationSimp": "解", "textSimp": "苏辙以所以得触者不可得。" }, { "noteId": "c044", "relation": "注", "relationTrad": "注", "text": "吳澄以微茫杳漠無形，故搏之不得。", "textTrad": "吳澄以微茫杳漠無形，故搏之不得。", "relationSimp": "注", "textSimp": "吴澄以微茫杳漠无形，故搏之不得。" }, { "noteId": "c047", "relation": "解", "relationTrad": "解", "text": "憨山以微為無相，故搏之不可得。", "textTrad": "憨山以微為無相，故搏之不可得。", "relationSimp": "解", "textSimp": "憨山以微为无相，故搏之不可得。" }, { "noteId": "c048", "relation": "本義", "relationTrad": "本義", "text": "魏源校本章異文，引吳澄、呂惠卿為說。", "textTrad": "魏源校本章異文，引吳澄、呂惠卿為說。", "relationSimp": "本义", "textSimp": "魏源校本章异文，引吴澄、吕惠卿为说。" }, { "noteId": "c049", "relation": "衍", "relationTrad": "衍", "text": "王夫之以無間乘有間，患與名去。", "textTrad": "王夫之以無間乘有間，患與名去。", "relationSimp": "衍", "textSimp": "王夫之以无间乘有间，患与名去。" } ], "nameSimp": "搏之不得名曰微", "questionSimp": "「搏之不得」何以名之曰「微」？「微」何以兼微妙与无形二义？", "introSimp": "第三句以「微」标无形之名。河上公谓无形曰微，一无体故不可搏持而得；成玄英以妙释微，谓体非形质、不可搏触而得；唐玄宗御注以妙色释微，谓道无形而于无形之中能形，故名微，御疏以无形之中能状众形申之；李荣谓大象无形、难可搏触，微者机也、无也，动而应物；陆希声谓道非色声形而强名希夷微；吕惠卿谓搏者无有，虽不得而能阴能阳、能短能长，不可名以无形；苏辙谓所以得触者不可得；吴澄谓微茫则杳漠无形，故搏之不得；憨山谓微为无相，故搏不可得；魏源校异文而引二家；王夫之谓道无间而人强分，以无间乘有间则患与名去；王弼以无状无象、不得而知为说。" }, { "id": "san-zhe-hun-yi", "name": "此三者不可致詰故混而為一", "nameTrad": "此三者不可致詰故混而為一", "question": "夷、希、微三者既分，何以又說「不可致詰，故混而為一」？", "questionTrad": "夷、希、微三者既分，何以又說「不可致詰，故混而為一」？", "intro": "第四句總明三者不可致詰而混為一。河上公謂夷希微無色無聲無形，口不能言、書不能傳，故名合一；王弼謂無狀無象、無聲無響，故無所不通、無所不往，不得而知，更以耳目體不知為名，故不可致詰；成玄英謂真而應則散一為三，應而真則混三歸一，一三三一不一不異；唐玄宗御注謂道非聲色形法，詰不可得，但得夷希微，道非希微故復混而為一，御疏以假名與道用申之；李榮謂三者俱非聲色、並絕形名，混沌無分寄名為一，一三互遣、忘言契理；陸希聲謂三者非詰責可得，混此三者謂之為一；呂惠卿謂三者終不可致詰，隳聰明、離形去智則視聽搏混而為一；蘇轍謂一者性也、三者性之用，混歸於一即反本；吳澄謂夷希微與一皆指常德，混同無分別而名為一；憨山謂道體混融不可分故為一；魏源校異文而引二家；王夫之謂道無間而人強分，故執之別之而道僅為名。", "introTrad": "第四句總明三者不可致詰而混為一。河上公謂夷希微無色無聲無形，口不能言、書不能傳，故名合一；王弼謂無狀無象、無聲無響，故無所不通、無所不往，不得而知，更以耳目體不知為名，故不可致詰；成玄英謂真而應則散一為三，應而真則混三歸一，一三三一不一不異；唐玄宗御注謂道非聲色形法，詰不可得，但得夷希微，道非希微故復混而為一，御疏以假名與道用申之；李榮謂三者俱非聲色、並絕形名，混沌無分寄名為一，一三互遣、忘言契理；陸希聲謂三者非詰責可得，混此三者謂之為一；呂惠卿謂三者終不可致詰，隳聰明、離形去智則視聽搏混而為一；蘇轍謂一者性也、三者性之用，混歸於一即反本；吳澄謂夷希微與一皆指常德，混同無分別而名為一；憨山謂道體混融不可分故為一；魏源校異文而引二家；王夫之謂道無間而人強分，故執之別之而道僅為名。", "positions": { "heshanggong": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "夷希微無色無聲無形，口不能言、書不能傳，故三名合而為一。", "thesisTrad": "夷希微無色無聲無形，口不能言、書不能傳，故三名合而為一。", "noteIds": [ "c002" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "夷希微无色无声无形，口不能言、书不能传，故三名合而为一。" }, "wangbi": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "無狀無象、無聲無響，故能無所不通，不得而知，故不可致詰而混為一。", "thesisTrad": "無狀無象、無聲無響，故能無所不通，不得而知，故不可致詰而混為一。", "noteIds": [ "c007" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "无状无象、无声无响，故能无所不通，不得而知，故不可致诘而混为一。" }, "chengxuanying": { "workType": "疏", "workTypeTrad": "疏", "thesis": "散一為三、混三歸一，一三三一不一不異，故不可致詰。", "thesisTrad": "散一為三、混三歸一，一三三一不一不異，故不可致詰。", "noteIds": [ "c011" ], "workTypeSimp": "疏", "thesisSimp": "散一为三、混三归一，一三三一不一不异，故不可致诘。" }, "tangxuanzong": { "workType": "御注", "workTypeTrad": "御注", "thesis": "道非聲色形法，詰不可得，但得夷希微；道非希微，故復混而為一。", "thesisTrad": "道非聲色形法，詰不可得，但得夷希微；道非希微，故復混而為一。", "noteIds": [ "c017", "c023" ], "workTypeSimp": "御注", "thesisSimp": "道非声色形法，诘不可得，但得夷希微；道非希微，故复混而为一。" }, "lirong": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "三者俱非聲色、並絕形名，混沌無分寄名為一；一三互遣，忘言契理。", "thesisTrad": "三者俱非聲色、並絕形名，混沌無分寄名為一；一三互遣，忘言契理。", "noteIds": [ "c032" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "三者俱非声色、并绝形名，混沌无分寄名为一；一三互遣，忘言契理。" }, "luxisheng": { "workType": "傳", "workTypeTrad": "傳", "thesis": "三者非詰責可得，混此三者謂之為一。", "thesisTrad": "三者非詰責可得，混此三者謂之為一。", "noteIds": [ "c037" ], "workTypeSimp": "传", "thesisSimp": "三者非诘责可得，混此三者谓之为一。" }, "lvhuiqing": { "workType": "傳", "workTypeTrad": "傳", "thesis": "三者終不可致詰；隳聰明、離形去智，則視聽搏混而為一。", "thesisTrad": "三者終不可致詰；隳聰明、離形去智，則視聽搏混而為一。", "noteIds": [ "c038" ], "workTypeSimp": "传", "thesisSimp": "三者终不可致诘；隳聪明、离形去智，则视听搏混而为一。" }, "suzhe": { "workType": "解", "workTypeTrad": "解", "thesis": "一者性也，三者性之用；混歸於一即反本，非復混一則日遠。", "thesisTrad": "一者性也，三者性之用；混歸於一即反本，非復混一則日遠。", "noteIds": [ "c039" ], "workTypeSimp": "解", "thesisSimp": "一者性也，三者性之用；混归于一即反本，非复混一则日远。" }, "wucheng": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "夷希微與一皆指常德，混同無所分別而名之為一。", "thesisTrad": "夷希微與一皆指常德，混同無所分別而名之為一。", "noteIds": [ "c044" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "夷希微与一皆指常德，混同无所分别而名之为一。" }, "hanshan": { "workType": "解", "workTypeTrad": "解", "thesis": "道體混融而不可分，故為一。", "thesisTrad": "道體混融而不可分，故為一。", "noteIds": [ "c047" ], "workTypeSimp": "解", "thesisSimp": "道体混融而不可分，故为一。" }, "weiyuan": { "workType": "本義", "workTypeTrad": "本義", "thesis": "校「故混而為一」諸本異同，引吳澄、呂惠卿為說。", "thesisTrad": "校「故混而為一」諸本異同，引吳澄、呂惠卿為說。", "noteIds": [ "c048" ], "workTypeSimp": "本义", "thesisSimp": "校「故混而为一」诸本异同，引吴澄、吕惠卿为说。" }, "wangfuzhi": { "workType": "衍", "workTypeTrad": "衍", "thesis": "道無間而人強分，故執之別之而道僅為名；以無間乘有間，則患與名去。", "thesisTrad": "道無間而人強分，故執之別之而道僅為名；以無間乘有間，則患與名去。", "noteIds": [ "c049" ], "workTypeSimp": "衍", "thesisSimp": "道无间而人强分，故执之别之而道仅为名；以无间乘有间，则患与名去。" } }, "chain": [ { "noteId": "c002", "relation": "立論", "relationTrad": "立論", "text": "河上公以夷希微無色無聲無形，故名合一。", "textTrad": "河上公以夷希微無色無聲無形，故名合一。", "relationSimp": "立论", "textSimp": "河上公以夷希微无色无声无形，故名合一。" }, { "noteId": "c007", "relation": "注", "relationTrad": "注", "text": "王弼以無狀無象、無聲無響，故不可致詰而混為一。", "textTrad": "王弼以無狀無象、無聲無響，故不可致詰而混為一。", "relationSimp": "注", "textSimp": "王弼以无状无象、无声无响，故不可致诘而混为一。" }, { "noteId": "c011", "relation": "疏", "relationTrad": "疏", "text": "成玄英以散一為三、混三歸一，一三不一不異。", "textTrad": "成玄英以散一為三、混三歸一，一三不一不異。", "relationSimp": "疏", "textSimp": "成玄英以散一为三、混三归一，一三不一不异。" }, { "noteId": "c017", "relation": "御注", "relationTrad": "御注", "text": "唐玄宗御注以道非聲色形法，詰不可得，故復混為一。", "textTrad": "唐玄宗御注以道非聲色形法，詰不可得，故復混為一。", "relationSimp": "御注", "textSimp": "唐玄宗御注以道非声色形法，诘不可得，故复混为一。" }, { "noteId": "c032", "relation": "注", "relationTrad": "注", "text": "李榮以三者俱非聲色，混沌無分寄名為一。", "textTrad": "李榮以三者俱非聲色，混沌無分寄名為一。", "relationSimp": "注", "textSimp": "李荣以三者俱非声色，混沌无分寄名为一。" }, { "noteId": "c037", "relation": "傳", "relationTrad": "傳", "text": "陸希聲以三者非詰責可得，混此三者謂之為一。", "textTrad": "陸希聲以三者非詰責可得，混此三者謂之為一。", "relationSimp": "传", "textSimp": "陆希声以三者非诘责可得，混此三者谓之为一。" }, { "noteId": "c038", "relation": "傳", "relationTrad": "傳", "text": "呂惠卿以隳聰明、離形去智，則視聽搏混而為一。", "textTrad": "呂惠卿以隳聰明、離形去智，則視聽搏混而為一。", "relationSimp": "传", "textSimp": "吕惠卿以隳聪明、离形去智，则视听搏混而为一。" }, { "noteId": "c039", "relation": "解", "relationTrad": "解", "text": "蘇轍以一為性、三者性之用，混歸於一即反本。", "textTrad": "蘇轍以一為性、三者性之用，混歸於一即反本。", "relationSimp": "解", "textSimp": "苏辙以一为性、三者性之用，混归于一即反本。" }, { "noteId": "c044", "relation": "注", "relationTrad": "注", "text": "吳澄以夷希微與一皆指常德，混同無分別。", "textTrad": "吳澄以夷希微與一皆指常德，混同無分別。", "relationSimp": "注", "textSimp": "吴澄以夷希微与一皆指常德，混同无分别。" }, { "noteId": "c047", "relation": "解", "relationTrad": "解", "text": "憨山以道體混融不可分，故為一。", "textTrad": "憨山以道體混融不可分，故為一。", "relationSimp": "解", "textSimp": "憨山以道体混融不可分，故为一。" }, { "noteId": "c048", "relation": "本義", "relationTrad": "本義", "text": "魏源校「故混而為一」諸本異同。", "textTrad": "魏源校「故混而為一」諸本異同。", "relationSimp": "本义", "textSimp": "魏源校「故混而为一」诸本异同。" }, { "noteId": "c049", "relation": "衍", "relationTrad": "衍", "text": "王夫之謂道無間而人強分，道僅為名。", "textTrad": "王夫之謂道無間而人強分，道僅為名。", "relationSimp": "衍", "textSimp": "王夫之谓道无间而人强分，道仅为名。" } ], "nameSimp": "此三者不可致诘故混而为一", "questionSimp": "夷、希、微三者既分，何以又说「不可致诘，故混而为一」？", "introSimp": "第四句总明三者不可致诘而混为一。河上公谓夷希微无色无声无形，口不能言、书不能传，故名合一；王弼谓无状无象、无声无响，故无所不通、无所不往，不得而知，更以耳目体不知为名，故不可致诘；成玄英谓真而应则散一为三，应而真则混三归一，一三三一不一不异；唐玄宗御注谓道非声色形法，诘不可得，但得夷希微，道非希微故复混而为一，御疏以假名与道用申之；李荣谓三者俱非声色、并绝形名，混沌无分寄名为一，一三互遣、忘言契理；陆希声谓三者非诘责可得，混此三者谓之为一；吕惠卿谓三者终不可致诘，隳聪明、离形去智则视听搏混而为一；苏辙谓一者性也、三者性之用，混归于一即反本；吴澄谓夷希微与一皆指常德，混同无分别而名为一；憨山谓道体混融不可分故为一；魏源校异文而引二家；王夫之谓道无间而人强分，故执之别之而道仅为名。" }, { "id": "wuzhuang-zhixiang", "name": "無狀之狀無物之象", "nameTrad": "無狀之狀無物之象", "question": "道既不可名，何以又稱「無狀之狀，無物之象」？「其上不皦，其下不昧」與「迎之不見其首，隨之不見其後」如何相貫？", "questionTrad": "道既不可名，何以又稱「無狀之狀，無物之象」？「其上不皦，其下不昧」與「迎之不見其首，隨之不見其後」如何相貫？", "intro": "第五句以不皦不昧、繩繩不可名、復歸無物狀道，末以無狀之狀、無物之象、惚恍、迎隨不見首尾申之。河上公謂一在天上不皎皎、在天下不昧昧，繩繩動行無窮，不可以色聲形名，物當歸之以無質；無形狀而能為萬物作形狀，無物質而能為萬物設形象，忽忽恍恍若存若亡。王弼謂欲言無而物由以成，欲言有而不見其形，故曰無狀之狀、無物之象，惚恍不可定。成玄英謂道非愚非智，升三清不益明、墜九幽不加闇，繩繩運動而視聽莫尋，復本歸根即無名無相，迎隨明非古非今。唐玄宗御注謂在上不明、在下不昧，繩繩運動無窮、生物而未始有物，妙本湛然故復歸無物，無形狀之狀、無物質之象，有無難名故惚恍，無始無終故迎隨不見。嚴遵謂沉沉汎汎復歸虛空，無狀無不狀、無象無不象，光於惚恍、大而若小。李榮謂至道不皎不昧，不可以明闇名，超群有故歸無，無物亦無，從體起用、攝跡歸本，有無怳惚無能名，迎隨非有非無。陸希聲謂不皦不昧、繩繩運行而復歸無物，道體真精本非無物，故謂無質之狀、無形之象，迎隨不見首尾。呂惠卿謂其上非光故不皦，其下非土故不昧，繩繩調直有信而不可名，復歸無物，無狀之狀、無物之象而未嘗無物，是謂惚恍，無前無後故迎隨不見。蘇轍謂道在上不皦、在下不昧，不可以形數推，繩繩運而不絕而卒歸於無，無狀之狀、無象之象皆非無，有無不可名故惚恍，道無所不在故無前後。吳澄謂德在有無之間，道無名故不皦，物有形故不昧，反還其初則歸於無物，道無物故無狀無象，德有名故可狀可象，惚恍不可名故迎隨不見。憨山謂日月不足增其明故不皦，幽暗不能昏其明故不昧，繩繩綿綿不絕而不可名，畢竟至虛復歸無物，杳冥至精為無狀之狀，恍惚似有為無象之象，前觀無始後觀無終。魏源引吳澄、呂惠卿，以德在有無之間、無物指道、無端之紀為說。王夫之謂物有間故物皆為患，道無間故道僅為名，以無間乘有間則患與名去而斯無物，有物或輕或重、或光或塵、或作或止是謂無紀。", "introTrad": "第五句以不皦不昧、繩繩不可名、復歸無物狀道，末以無狀之狀、無物之象、惚恍、迎隨不見首尾申之。河上公謂一在天上不皎皎、在天下不昧昧，繩繩動行無窮，不可以色聲形名，物當歸之以無質；無形狀而能為萬物作形狀，無物質而能為萬物設形象，忽忽恍恍若存若亡。王弼謂欲言無而物由以成，欲言有而不見其形，故曰無狀之狀、無物之象，惚恍不可定。成玄英謂道非愚非智，升三清不益明、墜九幽不加闇，繩繩運動而視聽莫尋，復本歸根即無名無相，迎隨明非古非今。唐玄宗御注謂在上不明、在下不昧，繩繩運動無窮、生物而未始有物，妙本湛然故復歸無物，無形狀之狀、無物質之象，有無難名故惚恍，無始無終故迎隨不見。嚴遵謂沉沉汎汎復歸虛空，無狀無不狀、無象無不象，光於惚恍、大而若小。李榮謂至道不皎不昧，不可以明闇名，超群有故歸無，無物亦無，從體起用、攝跡歸本，有無怳惚無能名，迎隨非有非無。陸希聲謂不皦不昧、繩繩運行而復歸無物，道體真精本非無物，故謂無質之狀、無形之象，迎隨不見首尾。呂惠卿謂其上非光故不皦，其下非土故不昧，繩繩調直有信而不可名，復歸無物，無狀之狀、無物之象而未嘗無物，是謂惚恍，無前無後故迎隨不見。蘇轍謂道在上不皦、在下不昧，不可以形數推，繩繩運而不絕而卒歸於無，無狀之狀、無象之象皆非無，有無不可名故惚恍，道無所不在故無前後。吳澄謂德在有無之間，道無名故不皦，物有形故不昧，反還其初則歸於無物，道無物故無狀無象，德有名故可狀可象，惚恍不可名故迎隨不見。憨山謂日月不足增其明故不皦，幽暗不能昏其明故不昧，繩繩綿綿不絕而不可名，畢竟至虛復歸無物，杳冥至精為無狀之狀，恍惚似有為無象之象，前觀無始後觀無終。魏源引吳澄、呂惠卿，以德在有無之間、無物指道、無端之紀為說。王夫之謂物有間故物皆為患，道無間故道僅為名，以無間乘有間則患與名去而斯無物，有物或輕或重、或光或塵、或作或止是謂無紀。", "positions": { "heshanggong": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "一在上不皎皎、在下不昧昧，繩繩動行無窮；無形狀而作形狀，無物質而設形象，忽恍若存若亡。", "thesisTrad": "一在上不皎皎、在下不昧昧，繩繩動行無窮；無形狀而作形狀，無物質而設形象，忽恍若存若亡。", "noteIds": [ "c003", "c004", "c005" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "一在上不皎皎、在下不昧昧，绳绳动行无穷；无形状而作形状，无物质而设形象，忽恍若存若亡。" }, "wangbi": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "欲言無而物由以成，欲言有而不見其形，故曰無狀之狀、無物之象；惚恍不可定。", "thesisTrad": "欲言無而物由以成，欲言有而不見其形，故曰無狀之狀、無物之象；惚恍不可定。", "noteIds": [ "c008" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "欲言无而物由以成，欲言有而不见其形，故曰无状之状、无物之象；惚恍不可定。" }, "chengxuanying": { "workType": "疏", "workTypeTrad": "疏", "thesis": "道非愚非智，不增不減；繩繩運動而視聽莫尋，復本歸根即無名無相；迎隨明非古非今。", "thesisTrad": "道非愚非智，不增不減；繩繩運動而視聽莫尋，復本歸根即無名無相；迎隨明非古非今。", "noteIds": [ "c012", "c013", "c014" ], "workTypeSimp": "疏", "thesisSimp": "道非愚非智，不增不减；绳绳运动而视听莫寻，复本归根即无名无相；迎随明非古非今。" }, "tangxuanzong": { "workType": "御注", "workTypeTrad": "御注", "thesis": "在上不明、在下不昧；繩繩運動無窮，生物而未始有物；無形狀之狀、無物質之象，有無難名故惚恍；無始無終故迎隨不見。", "thesisTrad": "在上不明、在下不昧；繩繩運動無窮，生物而未始有物；無形狀之狀、無物質之象，有無難名故惚恍；無始無終故迎隨不見。", "noteIds": [ "c018", "c019", "c020", "c024", "c025", "c026" ], "workTypeSimp": "御注", "thesisSimp": "在上不明、在下不昧；绳绳运动无穷，生物而未始有物；无形状之状、无物质之象，有无难名故惚恍；无始无终故迎随不见。" }, "yanzun": { "workType": "指歸", "workTypeTrad": "指歸", "thesis": "沉沉汎汎復歸虛空；無狀無不狀、無象無不象，光於惚恍、大而若小。", "thesisTrad": "沉沉汎汎復歸虛空；無狀無不狀、無象無不象，光於惚恍、大而若小。", "noteIds": [ "c028", "c029" ], "workTypeSimp": "指归", "thesisSimp": "沉沉泛泛复归虚空；无状无不状、无象无不象，光于惚恍、大而若小。" }, "lirong": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "至道不皎不昧，不可以明闇名；超群有故歸無，無物亦無；有無怳惚無能名，迎隨非有非無。", "thesisTrad": "至道不皎不昧，不可以明闇名；超群有故歸無，無物亦無；有無怳惚無能名，迎隨非有非無。", "noteIds": [ "c033", "c034", "c035" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "至道不皎不昧，不可以明暗名；超群有故归无，无物亦无；有无怳惚无能名，迎随非有非无。" }, "luxisheng": { "workType": "傳", "workTypeTrad": "傳", "thesis": "不皦不昧、繩繩運行而復歸無物；道體真精本非無物，故謂無質之狀、無形之象；迎隨不見首尾。", "thesisTrad": "不皦不昧、繩繩運行而復歸無物；道體真精本非無物，故謂無質之狀、無形之象；迎隨不見首尾。", "noteIds": [ "c037" ], "workTypeSimp": "传", "thesisSimp": "不皦不昧、绳绳运行而复归无物；道体真精本非无物，故谓无质之状、无形之象；迎随不见首尾。" }, "lvhuiqing": { "workType": "傳", "workTypeTrad": "傳", "thesis": "其上非光故不皦，其下非土故不昧；繩繩有信而不可名，復歸無物；無狀之狀、無物之象而未嘗無物，是謂惚恍；無前無後故迎隨不見。", "thesisTrad": "其上非光故不皦，其下非土故不昧；繩繩有信而不可名，復歸無物；無狀之狀、無物之象而未嘗無物，是謂惚恍；無前無後故迎隨不見。", "noteIds": [ "c038" ], "workTypeSimp": "传", "thesisSimp": "其上非光故不皦，其下非土故不昧；绳绳有信而不可名，复归无物；无状之状、无物之象而未尝无物，是谓惚恍；无前无后故迎随不见。" }, "suzhe": { "workType": "解", "workTypeTrad": "解", "thesis": "道在上不皦、在下不昧，不可以形數推；繩繩運而不絕而卒歸於無；無狀之狀、無象之象皆非無，有無不可名故惚恍；道無所不在故無前後。", "thesisTrad": "道在上不皦、在下不昧，不可以形數推；繩繩運而不絕而卒歸於無；無狀之狀、無象之象皆非無，有無不可名故惚恍；道無所不在故無前後。", "noteIds": [ "c040", "c041", "c042" ], "workTypeSimp": "解", "thesisSimp": "道在上不皦、在下不昧，不可以形数推；绳绳运而不绝而卒归于无；无状之状、无象之象皆非无，有无不可名故惚恍；道无所不在故无前后。" }, "wucheng": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "德在有無之間，道無名故不皦，物有形故不昧；反還其初歸於無物；道無物故無狀無象，德有名故可狀可象；惚恍不可名故迎隨不見。", "thesisTrad": "德在有無之間，道無名故不皦，物有形故不昧；反還其初歸於無物；道無物故無狀無象，德有名故可狀可象；惚恍不可名故迎隨不見。", "noteIds": [ "c045", "c046" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "德在有无之间，道无名故不皦，物有形故不昧；反还其初归于无物；道无物故无状无象，德有名故可状可象；惚恍不可名故迎随不见。" }, "hanshan": { "workType": "解", "workTypeTrad": "解", "thesis": "日月不足增其明故不皦，幽暗不能昏其明故不昧；繩繩綿綿不絕而不可名，畢竟至虛復歸無物；無狀之狀、無象之象即惚恍；前觀無始後觀無終。", "thesisTrad": "日月不足增其明故不皦，幽暗不能昏其明故不昧；繩繩綿綿不絕而不可名，畢竟至虛復歸無物；無狀之狀、無象之象即惚恍；前觀無始後觀無終。", "noteIds": [ "c047" ], "workTypeSimp": "解", "thesisSimp": "日月不足增其明故不皦，幽暗不能昏其明故不昧；绳绳绵绵不绝而不可名，毕竟至虚复归无物；无状之状、无象之象即惚恍；前观无始后观无终。" }, "weiyuan": { "workType": "本義", "workTypeTrad": "本義", "thesis": "引吳澄、呂惠卿：德在有無之間，雖有名而不可名；無物指道，反還其初則歸無物；無端之紀為道紀。", "thesisTrad": "引吳澄、呂惠卿：德在有無之間，雖有名而不可名；無物指道，反還其初則歸無物；無端之紀為道紀。", "noteIds": [ "c048" ], "workTypeSimp": "本义", "thesisSimp": "引吴澄、吕惠卿：德在有无之间，虽有名而不可名；无物指道，反还其初则归无物；无端之纪为道纪。" }, "wangfuzhi": { "workType": "衍", "workTypeTrad": "衍", "thesis": "物有間故物皆為患，道無間故道僅為名；以無間乘有間，患與名去而斯無物；有物或輕或重、或光或塵、或作或止，是謂無紀。", "thesisTrad": "物有間故物皆為患，道無間故道僅為名；以無間乘有間，患與名去而斯無物；有物或輕或重、或光或塵、或作或止，是謂無紀。", "noteIds": [ "c049" ], "workTypeSimp": "衍", "thesisSimp": "物有间故物皆为患，道无间故道仅为名；以无间乘有间，患与名去而斯无物；有物或轻或重、或光或尘、或作或止，是谓无纪。" } }, "chain": [ { "noteId": "c003", "relation": "立論", "relationTrad": "立論", "text": "河上公以一在上不皎皎、在下不昧昧，繩繩動行無窮。", "textTrad": "河上公以一在上不皎皎、在下不昧昧，繩繩動行無窮。", "relationSimp": "立论", "textSimp": "河上公以一在上不皎皎、在下不昧昧，绳绳动行无穷。" }, { "noteId": "c008", "relation": "注", "relationTrad": "注", "text": "王弼以欲言有無皆不得其形，故曰無狀之狀、無物之象。", "textTrad": "王弼以欲言有無皆不得其形，故曰無狀之狀、無物之象。", "relationSimp": "注", "textSimp": "王弼以欲言有无皆不得其形，故曰无状之状、无物之象。" }, { "noteId": "c012", "relation": "疏", "relationTrad": "疏", "text": "成玄英以道不增不減，繩繩運動而視聽莫尋。", "textTrad": "成玄英以道不增不減，繩繩運動而視聽莫尋。", "relationSimp": "疏", "textSimp": "成玄英以道不增不减，绳绳运动而视听莫寻。" }, { "noteId": "c018", "relation": "御注", "relationTrad": "御注", "text": "唐玄宗御注以在上不明、在下不昧，妙本湛然故復歸無物。", "textTrad": "唐玄宗御注以在上不明、在下不昧，妙本湛然故復歸無物。", "relationSimp": "御注", "textSimp": "唐玄宗御注以在上不明、在下不昧，妙本湛然故复归无物。" }, { "noteId": "c028", "relation": "指歸", "relationTrad": "指歸", "text": "嚴遵以沉沉汎汎復歸虛空，無狀無不狀、無象無不象。", "textTrad": "嚴遵以沉沉汎汎復歸虛空，無狀無不狀、無象無不象。", "relationSimp": "指归", "textSimp": "严遵以沉沉泛泛复归虚空，无状无不状、无象无不象。" }, { "noteId": "c033", "relation": "注", "relationTrad": "注", "text": "李榮以至道不皎不昧，超群有故歸無，無物亦無。", "textTrad": "李榮以至道不皎不昧，超群有故歸無，無物亦無。", "relationSimp": "注", "textSimp": "李荣以至道不皎不昧，超群有故归无，无物亦无。" }, { "noteId": "c037", "relation": "傳", "relationTrad": "傳", "text": "陸希聲以不皦不昧、繩繩運行而復歸無物，故謂無質之狀、無形之象。", "textTrad": "陸希聲以不皦不昧、繩繩運行而復歸無物，故謂無質之狀、無形之象。", "relationSimp": "传", "textSimp": "陆希声以不皦不昧、绳绳运行而复归无物，故谓无质之状、无形之象。" }, { "noteId": "c038", "relation": "傳", "relationTrad": "傳", "text": "呂惠卿以其上非光故不皦，其下非土故不昧，無狀之狀而未嘗無物。", "textTrad": "呂惠卿以其上非光故不皦，其下非土故不昧，無狀之狀而未嘗無物。", "relationSimp": "传", "textSimp": "吕惠卿以其上非光故不皦，其下非土故不昧，无状之状而未尝无物。" }, { "noteId": "c040", "relation": "解", "relationTrad": "解", "text": "蘇轍以道不可以形數推，繩繩運而不絕而卒歸於無。", "textTrad": "蘇轍以道不可以形數推，繩繩運而不絕而卒歸於無。", "relationSimp": "解", "textSimp": "苏辙以道不可以形数推，绳绳运而不绝而卒归于无。" }, { "noteId": "c045", "relation": "注", "relationTrad": "注", "text": "吳澄以德在有無之間，道無名故不皦，物有形故不昧。", "textTrad": "吳澄以德在有無之間，道無名故不皦，物有形故不昧。", "relationSimp": "注", "textSimp": "吴澄以德在有无之间，道无名故不皦，物有形故不昧。" }, { "noteId": "c047", "relation": "解", "relationTrad": "解", "text": "憨山以繩繩綿綿不絕而不可名，畢竟至虛復歸無物。", "textTrad": "憨山以繩繩綿綿不絕而不可名，畢竟至虛復歸無物。", "relationSimp": "解", "textSimp": "憨山以绳绳绵绵不绝而不可名，毕竟至虚复归无物。" }, { "noteId": "c048", "relation": "本義", "relationTrad": "本義", "text": "魏源引吳澄、呂惠卿，以德在有無之間、無物指道為說。", "textTrad": "魏源引吳澄、呂惠卿，以德在有無之間、無物指道為說。", "relationSimp": "本义", "textSimp": "魏源引吴澄、吕惠卿，以德在有无之间、无物指道为说。" }, { "noteId": "c049", "relation": "衍", "relationTrad": "衍", "text": "王夫之以無間乘有間，患與名去而斯無物。", "textTrad": "王夫之以無間乘有間，患與名去而斯無物。", "relationSimp": "衍", "textSimp": "王夫之以无间乘有间，患与名去而斯无物。" } ], "nameSimp": "无状之状无物之象", "questionSimp": "道既不可名，何以又称「无状之状，无物之象」？「其上不皦，其下不昧」与「迎之不见其首，随之不见其后」如何相贯？", "introSimp": "第五句以不皦不昧、绳绳不可名、复归无物状道，末以无状之状、无物之象、惚恍、迎随不见首尾申之。河上公谓一在天上不皎皎、在天下不昧昧，绳绳动行无穷，不可以色声形名，物当归之以无质；无形状而能为万物作形状，无物质而能为万物设形象，忽忽恍恍若存若亡。王弼谓欲言无而物由以成，欲言有而不见其形，故曰无状之状、无物之象，惚恍不可定。成玄英谓道非愚非智，升三清不益明、坠九幽不加暗，绳绳运动而视听莫寻，复本归根即无名无相，迎随明非古非今。唐玄宗御注谓在上不明、在下不昧，绳绳运动无穷、生物而未始有物，妙本湛然故复归无物，无形状之状、无物质之象，有无难名故惚恍，无始无终故迎随不见。严遵谓沉沉泛泛复归虚空，无状无不状、无象无不象，光于惚恍、大而若小。李荣谓至道不皎不昧，不可以明暗名，超群有故归无，无物亦无，从体起用、摄迹归本，有无怳惚无能名，迎随非有非无。陆希声谓不皦不昧、绳绳运行而复归无物，道体真精本非无物，故谓无质之状、无形之象，迎随不见首尾。吕惠卿谓其上非光故不皦，其下非土故不昧，绳绳调直有信而不可名，复归无物，无状之状、无物之象而未尝无物，是谓惚恍，无前无后故迎随不见。苏辙谓道在上不皦、在下不昧，不可以形数推，绳绳运而不绝而卒归于无，无状之状、无象之象皆非无，有无不可名故惚恍，道无所不在故无前后。吴澄谓德在有无之间，道无名故不皦，物有形故不昧，反还其初则归于无物，道无物故无状无象，德有名故可状可象，惚恍不可名故迎随不见。憨山谓日月不足增其明故不皦，幽暗不能昏其明故不昧，绳绳绵绵不绝而不可名，毕竟至虚复归无物，杳冥至精为无状之状，恍惚似有为无象之象，前观无始后观无终。魏源引吴澄、吕惠卿，以德在有无之间、无物指道、无端之纪为说。王夫之谓物有间故物皆为患，道无间故道仅为名，以无间乘有间则患与名去而斯无物，有物或轻或重、或光或尘、或作或止是谓无纪。" }, { "id": "zhigu-yujin", "name": "執古之道以御今之有", "nameTrad": "執古之道以御今之有", "question": "「執古之道」何以能「御今之有」？「能知古始」何以謂之「道紀」？", "questionTrad": "「執古之道」何以能「御今之有」？「能知古始」何以謂之「道紀」？", "intro": "末句以執古御今、知古始為道紀作結。河上公謂聖人執古道生一以御萬物，知今當有一，人能知上古本始有一即知道之紀綱；王弼謂無形無名者為萬物之宗，今古不同而莫不由之以成治，故可執古道以御今有，上古雖遠其道存，故可知識古始；成玄英謂持太古無名之道調御今之有生，知無始無終、不今不古而古而今，為至道綱紀；唐玄宗御注謂執古無為之道御今有為之事則反淳樸，知古始所行為道化綱紀，御疏以古先帝王無為道化申之；嚴遵謂執古自然以御今，不為夷狄變、不為中國改容，一以知始一以知終，為虛綱紀；李榮謂古道無為為正、今道有為為邪，持無為正有為，息澆薄反淳和，上御下正、下從上敬；陸希聲謂執古無為御今有為，遺淳反樸復於太古，知太古淳樸之性為大道綱紀；呂惠卿謂無前無後則不古不今，而未嘗無古今，執古御今，知古所自始、今所從來，無端之紀即道紀；蘇轍謂古者物所從生，有者物之今、無者物之古，執其所從生則進退疾徐在我；吳澄謂德源出於道、流溥於萬物，故執古御今，古始者道、道紀者德，如理絲有條；憨山謂聖人執妙道御世，知古始即道統所繫；魏源引呂惠卿，以知今所從來則知古所自始、無端之紀為說；王夫之謂以無間乘有間則患與名去，道生於未陰未陽而死於仁義，非至常不足以與斯。", "introTrad": "末句以執古御今、知古始為道紀作結。河上公謂聖人執古道生一以御萬物，知今當有一，人能知上古本始有一即知道之紀綱；王弼謂無形無名者為萬物之宗，今古不同而莫不由之以成治，故可執古道以御今有，上古雖遠其道存，故可知識古始；成玄英謂持太古無名之道調御今之有生，知無始無終、不今不古而古而今，為至道綱紀；唐玄宗御注謂執古無為之道御今有為之事則反淳樸，知古始所行為道化綱紀，御疏以古先帝王無為道化申之；嚴遵謂執古自然以御今，不為夷狄變、不為中國改容，一以知始一以知終，為虛綱紀；李榮謂古道無為為正、今道有為為邪，持無為正有為，息澆薄反淳和，上御下正、下從上敬；陸希聲謂執古無為御今有為，遺淳反樸復於太古，知太古淳樸之性為大道綱紀；呂惠卿謂無前無後則不古不今，而未嘗無古今，執古御今，知古所自始、今所從來，無端之紀即道紀；蘇轍謂古者物所從生，有者物之今、無者物之古，執其所從生則進退疾徐在我；吳澄謂德源出於道、流溥於萬物，故執古御今，古始者道、道紀者德，如理絲有條；憨山謂聖人執妙道御世，知古始即道統所繫；魏源引呂惠卿，以知今所從來則知古所自始、無端之紀為說；王夫之謂以無間乘有間則患與名去，道生於未陰未陽而死於仁義，非至常不足以與斯。", "positions": { "heshanggong": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "聖人執古道生一以御萬物，知今當有一；知上古本始有一，是謂知道之紀綱。", "thesisTrad": "聖人執古道生一以御萬物，知今當有一；知上古本始有一，是謂知道之紀綱。", "noteIds": [ "c006" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "圣人执古道生一以御万物，知今当有一；知上古本始有一，是谓知道之纪纲。" }, "wangbi": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "無形無名者為萬物之宗，今古不同而莫不由之以成治；執古道御今有，上古雖遠其道存。", "thesisTrad": "無形無名者為萬物之宗，今古不同而莫不由之以成治；執古道御今有，上古雖遠其道存。", "noteIds": [ "c009" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "无形无名者为万物之宗，今古不同而莫不由之以成治；执古道御今有，上古虽远其道存。" }, "chengxuanying": { "workType": "疏", "workTypeTrad": "疏", "thesis": "持太古無名之道調御今之有生；知無始無終、不今不古而古而今，為至道綱紀。", "thesisTrad": "持太古無名之道調御今之有生；知無始無終、不今不古而古而今，為至道綱紀。", "noteIds": [ "c015" ], "workTypeSimp": "疏", "thesisSimp": "持太古无名之道调御今之有生；知无始无终、不今不古而古而今，为至道纲纪。" }, "tangxuanzong": { "workType": "御注", "workTypeTrad": "御注", "thesis": "執古無為御今有為則反淳樸；知古始所行，是謂道化綱紀。", "thesisTrad": "執古無為御今有為則反淳樸；知古始所行，是謂道化綱紀。", "noteIds": [ "c021", "c027" ], "workTypeSimp": "御注", "thesisSimp": "执古无为御今有为则反淳朴；知古始所行，是谓道化纲纪。" }, "yanzun": { "workType": "指歸", "workTypeTrad": "指歸", "thesis": "執古自然以御今，不為夷狄變、不為中國改容；一以知始一以知終，為虛綱紀。", "thesisTrad": "執古自然以御今，不為夷狄變、不為中國改容；一以知始一以知終，為虛綱紀。", "noteIds": [ "c030" ], "workTypeSimp": "指归", "thesisSimp": "执古自然以御今，不为夷狄变、不为中国改容；一以知始一以知终，为虚纲纪。" }, "lirong": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "古道無為正、今道有為邪；持無為正有為，息澆薄反淳和，上御下正、下從上敬。", "thesisTrad": "古道無為正、今道有為邪；持無為正有為，息澆薄反淳和，上御下正、下從上敬。", "noteIds": [ "c036" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "古道无为正、今道有为邪；持无为正有为，息浇薄反淳和，上御下正、下从上敬。" }, "luxisheng": { "workType": "傳", "workTypeTrad": "傳", "thesis": "執古無為御今有為，遺淳反樸復於太古；知太古淳樸之性為大道綱紀。", "thesisTrad": "執古無為御今有為，遺淳反樸復於太古；知太古淳樸之性為大道綱紀。", "noteIds": [ "c037" ], "workTypeSimp": "传", "thesisSimp": "执古无为御今有为，遗淳反朴复于太古；知太古淳朴之性为大道纲纪。" }, "lvhuiqing": { "workType": "傳", "workTypeTrad": "傳", "thesis": "無前無後則不古不今，而未嘗無古今；執古御今，知古所自始、今所從來，無端之紀即道紀。", "thesisTrad": "無前無後則不古不今，而未嘗無古今；執古御今，知古所自始、今所從來，無端之紀即道紀。", "noteIds": [ "c038" ], "workTypeSimp": "传", "thesisSimp": "无前无后则不古不今，而未尝无古今；执古御今，知古所自始、今所从来，无端之纪即道纪。" }, "suzhe": { "workType": "解", "workTypeTrad": "解", "thesis": "古者物所從生，有者物之今、無者物之古；執其所從生則進退疾徐在我。", "thesisTrad": "古者物所從生，有者物之今、無者物之古；執其所從生則進退疾徐在我。", "noteIds": [ "c043" ], "workTypeSimp": "解", "thesisSimp": "古者物所从生，有者物之今、无者物之古；执其所从生则进退疾徐在我。" }, "wucheng": { "workType": "注", "workTypeTrad": "注", "thesis": "德源出於道、流溥於萬物，故執古御今；古始者道，道紀者德，如理絲有條。", "thesisTrad": "德源出於道、流溥於萬物，故執古御今；古始者道，道紀者德，如理絲有條。", "noteIds": [ "c046" ], "workTypeSimp": "注", "thesisSimp": "德源出于道、流溥于万物，故执古御今；古始者道，道纪者德，如理丝有条。" }, "hanshan": { "workType": "解", "workTypeTrad": "解", "thesis": "聖人執妙道御世；知古始即道統所繫，是謂道紀。", "thesisTrad": "聖人執妙道御世；知古始即道統所繫，是謂道紀。", "noteIds": [ "c047" ], "workTypeSimp": "解", "thesisSimp": "圣人执妙道御世；知古始即道统所系，是谓道纪。" }, "weiyuan": { "workType": "本義", "workTypeTrad": "本義", "thesis": "引呂惠卿：知今所從來則知古所自始，無端之紀即道紀；道不可執，得此可執以為德。", "thesisTrad": "引呂惠卿：知今所從來則知古所自始，無端之紀即道紀；道不可執，得此可執以為德。", "noteIds": [ "c048" ], "workTypeSimp": "本义", "thesisSimp": "引吕惠卿：知今所从来则知古所自始，无端之纪即道纪；道不可执，得此可执以为德。" }, "wangfuzhi": { "workType": "衍", "workTypeTrad": "衍", "thesis": "以無間乘有間則患與名去；道生於未陰未陽而死於仁義，非至常不足以與斯。", "thesisTrad": "以無間乘有間則患與名去；道生於未陰未陽而死於仁義，非至常不足以與斯。", "noteIds": [ "c049" ], "workTypeSimp": "衍", "thesisSimp": "以无间乘有间则患与名去；道生于未阴未阳而死于仁义，非至常不足以与斯。" } }, "chain": [ { "noteId": "c006", "relation": "立論", "relationTrad": "立論", "text": "河上公以聖人執古道生一御萬物，知上古本始有一為道紀。", "textTrad": "河上公以聖人執古道生一御萬物，知上古本始有一為道紀。", "relationSimp": "立论", "textSimp": "河上公以圣人执古道生一御万物，知上古本始有一为道纪。" }, { "noteId": "c009", "relation": "注", "relationTrad": "注", "text": "王弼以無形無名為萬物宗，執古道以御今有，知古始為道紀。", "textTrad": "王弼以無形無名為萬物宗，執古道以御今有，知古始為道紀。", "relationSimp": "注", "textSimp": "王弼以无形无名为万物宗，执古道以御今有，知古始为道纪。" }, { "noteId": "c015", "relation": "疏", "relationTrad": "疏", "text": "成玄英以持太古無名之道調御今之有生，為至道綱紀。", "textTrad": "成玄英以持太古無名之道調御今之有生，為至道綱紀。", "relationSimp": "疏", "textSimp": "成玄英以持太古无名之道调御今之有生，为至道纲纪。" }, { "noteId": "c021", "relation": "御注", "relationTrad": "御注", "text": "唐玄宗御注以執古無為御今有為則反淳樸，知古始為道化綱紀。", "textTrad": "唐玄宗御注以執古無為御今有為則反淳樸，知古始為道化綱紀。", "relationSimp": "御注", "textSimp": "唐玄宗御注以执古无为御今有为则反淳朴，知古始为道化纲纪。" }, { "noteId": "c030", "relation": "指歸", "relationTrad": "指歸", "text": "嚴遵以執古自然御今，一以知始一以知終，為虛綱紀。", "textTrad": "嚴遵以執古自然御今，一以知始一以知終，為虛綱紀。", "relationSimp": "指归", "textSimp": "严遵以执古自然御今，一以知始一以知终，为虚纲纪。" }, { "noteId": "c036", "relation": "注", "relationTrad": "注", "text": "李榮以持無為正有為，息澆薄反淳和。", "textTrad": "李榮以持無為正有為，息澆薄反淳和。", "relationSimp": "注", "textSimp": "李荣以持无为正有为，息浇薄反淳和。" }, { "noteId": "c037", "relation": "傳", "relationTrad": "傳", "text": "陸希聲以執古無為御今有為，知太古淳樸之性為道紀。", "textTrad": "陸希聲以執古無為御今有為，知太古淳樸之性為道紀。", "relationSimp": "传", "textSimp": "陆希声以执古无为御今有为，知太古淳朴之性为道纪。" }, { "noteId": "c038", "relation": "傳", "relationTrad": "傳", "text": "呂惠卿以無前無後則不古不今，無端之紀即道紀。", "textTrad": "呂惠卿以無前無後則不古不今，無端之紀即道紀。", "relationSimp": "传", "textSimp": "吕惠卿以无前无后则不古不今，无端之纪即道纪。" }, { "noteId": "c043", "relation": "解", "relationTrad": "解", "text": "蘇轍以執物所從生，則進退疾徐在我。", "textTrad": "蘇轍以執物所從生，則進退疾徐在我。", "relationSimp": "解", "textSimp": "苏辙以执物所从生，则进退疾徐在我。" }, { "noteId": "c046", "relation": "注", "relationTrad": "注", "text": "吳澄以古始者道、道紀者德，如理絲有條而不紊。", "textTrad": "吳澄以古始者道、道紀者德，如理絲有條而不紊。", "relationSimp": "注", "textSimp": "吴澄以古始者道、道纪者德，如理丝有条而不紊。" }, { "noteId": "c047", "relation": "解", "relationTrad": "解", "text": "憨山以聖人執妙道御世，知古始即道統所繫。", "textTrad": "憨山以聖人執妙道御世，知古始即道統所繫。", "relationSimp": "解", "textSimp": "憨山以圣人执妙道御世，知古始即道统所系。" }, { "noteId": "c048", "relation": "本義", "relationTrad": "本義", "text": "魏源引呂惠卿，以知今所從來則知古所自始。", "textTrad": "魏源引呂惠卿，以知今所從來則知古所自始。", "relationSimp": "本义", "textSimp": "魏源引吕惠卿，以知今所从来则知古所自始。" }, { "noteId": "c049", "relation": "衍", "relationTrad": "衍", "text": "王夫之以無間乘有間，患與名去；道生於未陰未陽而死於仁義。", "textTrad": "王夫之以無間乘有間，患與名去；道生於未陰未陽而死於仁義。", "relationSimp": "衍", "textSimp": "王夫之以无间乘有间，患与名去；道生于未阴未阳而死于仁义。" } ], "nameSimp": "执古之道以御今之有", "questionSimp": "「执古之道」何以能「御今之有」？「能知古始」何以谓之「道纪」？", "introSimp": "末句以执古御今、知古始为道纪作结。河上公谓圣人执古道生一以御万物，知今当有一，人能知上古本始有一即知道之纪纲；王弼谓无形无名者为万物之宗，今古不同而莫不由之以成治，故可执古道以御今有，上古虽远其道存，故可知识古始；成玄英谓持太古无名之道调御今之有生，知无始无终、不今不古而古而今，为至道纲纪；唐玄宗御注谓执古无为之道御今有为之事则反淳朴，知古始所行为道化纲纪，御疏以古先帝王无为道化申之；严遵谓执古自然以御今，不为夷狄变、不为中国改容，一以知始一以知终，为虚纲纪；李荣谓古道无为为正、今道有为为邪，持无为正有为，息浇薄反淳和，上御下正、下从上敬；陆希声谓执古无为御今有为，遗淳反朴复于太古，知太古淳朴之性为大道纲纪；吕惠卿谓无前无后则不古不今，而未尝无古今，执古御今，知古所自始、今所从来，无端之纪即道纪；苏辙谓古者物所从生，有者物之今、无者物之古，执其所从生则进退疾徐在我；吴澄谓德源出于道、流溥于万物，故执古御今，古始者道、道纪者德，如理丝有条；憨山谓圣人执妙道御世，知古始即道统所系；魏源引吕惠卿，以知今所从来则知古所自始、无端之纪为说；王夫之谓以无间乘有间则患与名去，道生于未阴未阳而死于仁义，非至常不足以与斯。" } ], "requiredSources": [ "heshanggong", "chengxuanying", "tangxuanzong" ] }, "schema": "librebook.chapter/1", "generatedAt": "2026-10-30T11:41:46.861Z", "keyPrefix": "laozi-14", "idRules": { "chapter": "章节目录名（slug），如 01；URL 为 /laozi/01/。", "sentence": "章内局部编号 sNNN，全篇引用使用 laozi-01:sNNN；页面锚点继续使用 #sNNN。", "commentary": "章内注号 cNNN，字词注 nNNN，校记 kNNN；编号在章内稳定，跨章引用时加章节前缀。", "paragraph": "章内段落号 pNNN，与 sentence.paragraph 对应。" }, "book": { "id": "laozi", "slug": "laozi", "title": "老子", "titleSimp": "老子", "author": "老聃", "authorSimp": "老聃", "era": "春秋", "eraSimp": "春秋", "editor": "河上公、王弼等", "editorSimp": "河上公、王弼等", "edition": "王弼《老子注》", "editionSimp": "王弼《老子注》", "baseLabel": "王弼《老子注》", "baseLabelSimp": "王弼《老子注》", "separationLabel": "河上公章句、王弼注、成玄英義疏、唐玄宗御注御疏、嚴遵指歸、李榮注、陸希聲傳、呂惠卿傳、蘇轍老子解、吳澄道德真經注、憨山道德經解、魏源老子本義、俞樾平議、王夫之老子衍十四家", "separationLabelSimp": "河上公章句、王弼注、成玄英义疏、唐玄宗御注御疏、严遵指归、李荣注、陆希声传、吕惠卿传、苏辙老子解、吴澄道德真经注、憨山道德经解、魏源老子本义、俞樾平议、王夫之老子衍十四家", "intro": "《老子》八十一章，分道經、德經。LibreBook 以王弼《老子注》為底本，逐章整理正文、舊注、今譯與校記；第一至八十一章已上線，全帙完竣。", "introSimp": "《老子》八十一章，分道经、德经。LibreBook 以王弼《老子注》为底本，逐章整理正文、旧注、今译与校记；第一至八十一章已上线，全帙完竣。" }, "volume": { "id": "daojing", "order": 1, "title": "道經", "titleSimp": "道经" }, "chapter": { "id": "laozi-14", "slug": "14", "order": 14, "title": "第十四章", "titleSimp": "第十四章", "status": "published", "revision": "初校", "review": "待复核", "updated": "2026-10-29", "summary": "以「視之不見，名曰夷；聽之不聞，名曰希；搏之不得，名曰微」起筆，次言三者混而為一、無狀之狀無物之象，末以「執古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是謂道紀」收束；附河上公、王弼、成玄英、唐玄宗、嚴遵、李榮、陸希聲、呂惠卿、蘇轍、吳澄、憨山、魏源、王夫之十三家注疏，嚴遵道經原卷缺卷一至六，此章三條輯文存於《玄德纂疏》，河上公、成玄英、唐玄宗、李榮逐句有注，陸希聲、呂惠卿、憨山、魏源、王夫之各以整章一段通釋，異文並見校記。", "summarySimp": "以「视之不见，名曰夷；听之不闻，名曰希；搏之不得，名曰微」起笔，次言三者混而为一、无状之状无物之象，末以「执古之道，以御今之有，能知古始，是谓道纪」收束；附河上公、王弼、成玄英、唐玄宗、严遵、李荣、陆希声、吕惠卿、苏辙、吴澄、憨山、魏源、王夫之十三家注疏，严遵道经原卷缺卷一至六，此章三条辑文存于《玄德纂疏》，河上公、成玄英、唐玄宗、李荣逐句有注，陆希声、吕惠卿、憨山、魏源、王夫之各以整章一段通释，异文并见校记。", "dataFile": "data/chapters/laozi-14.json", "relationsFile": "data/commentary-relations-laozi-14.json", "url": "/laozi/14/", "orderLabel": "第十四", "volumeId": "daojing", "part": "道經", "partSimp": "道经" }, "paragraphs": [ { "id": "p001", "no": 1, "sentenceIds": [ "s001", "s002", "s003", "s004", "s005", "s006" ], "count": 6 } ], "coverage": { "sentences": 6, "paragraphs": 1, "notes": { "covered": 6, "total": 6, "percent": 100 }, "charNotes": { "covered": 6, "total": 6, "percent": 100 }, "collations": { "covered": 5, "total": 6, "percent": 83.3, "count": 12 }, "translations": { "covered": 6, "total": 6, "percent": 100 } } }